Secondary Battery Formation SOC Window for Low-Voltage Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing secondary batteries face challenges in accurately detecting low-voltage defects caused by foreign materials or non-uniform formation conditions, leading to voltage drop issues and difficulties in distinguishing good from defective products, which hampers mass production and detection efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method involving charging secondary batteries to a state of charge (SOC) of 45% to 65% during the formation step, followed by aging and a low-voltage test at SOC 30% or less, with specific charging and pressurizing conditions to stabilize the SEI film and enhance defect detection, including high-temperature aging and degassing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If conventional charging method (10%-30% SOC) is used, then charging time is reduced, but detection precision of low voltage defects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging timeVSAvoiddetection precision of low voltage defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a formation charging process at 45%-65% SOC before the actual low voltage detection. This preliminary charging to a higher SOC level prepares the battery in a state where low voltage defects can be more effectively detected during subsequent aging and testing phases, thereby improving detection precision without extending the critical production timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If conventional OCV measurement method is used, then detection process is simple, but reliability of defect detection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection process complexityVSAvoidreliability of defect detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the defect detection process into multiple distinct phases: formation charging (45%-65% SOC), aging process, and low voltage detection phase. This segmentation allows each phase to be optimized independently - the formation phase prepares the battery state, the aging phase allows defects to manifest, and the detection phase measures voltage drops. This multi-stage approach significantly improves detection reliability while maintaining manageable process complexity through clear phase separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing a structured formation and aging process before actual defect detection. The battery is charged to 45%-65% SOC during formation, then aged under controlled conditions to allow low voltage defects to develop and manifest. Only after this preliminary preparation is the voltage measurement performed, ensuring that defects are in a detectable state, thereby greatly improving detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If formation conditions are not optimized, then manufacturing process is simple, but manufacturing precision of battery performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision of battery performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing specific formation conditions: charging to 45%-65% SOC instead of conventional levels, controlling aging temperature and duration, and setting specific C-rates for different charging stages. These parameter optimizations ensure uniform SEI film formation, consistent electrolyte distribution, and uniform lithium plating, thereby achieving high manufacturing precision in battery performance without significantly complicating the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces voltage drop in good products, increases detection power for low-voltage defects, shortens charging and detection times, and improves mass productivity by stabilizing the SEI film and enhancing defect detection sensitivity.

Implementation Method 1

The lithium secondary battery undergoes an activation process after the electrode assembly is assembled in the battery case together with the electrolyte. The activation process stabilizes the battery structure and makes it usable through charging, aging, and discharging the assembled battery.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

In particular, when a metal foreign material such as iron or copper is present in the positive electrode plate of the secondary battery, the metal foreign material may grow as a dendrite at the negative electrode.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDendrite growth: Electrodeposition

Data Source

PatentUS20250096328A1Method for manufacturing secondary battery
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
  • US20250096328A1 patent drawing
  • US20250096328A1 patent drawing
  • US20250096328A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for manufacturing a secondary battery includes a formation step for charging an assembled secondary battery to a state of charge (SOC) of 45% to 65%; an aging step for aging the secondary battery for which the formation has been completed; and a low voltage testing step for measuring the change in voltage value, wherein, in the low voltage testing step, a voltage value is measured in an SOC interval of 30% or lower. Since an SEI coating is stably formed in the method for manufacturing a secondary battery, charging time is shortened and thus the secondary battery can be mass-produced. In addition, since a low voltage test is performed in an interval in which the voltage change rate per capacity of a negative electrode is high, a low voltage defect due to non-uniformity of the formation process can be detected in the method for manufacturing the secondary battery.