Secondary Card User Identification via Biometric and ML Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional systems and methods fail to identify secondary card users, preventing them from building credit history and leaving accounts vulnerable to fraud, as they cannot distinguish between primary and secondary users based on transaction data alone.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning models to analyze transaction information, including biometric data and user preferences, prompts the primary account holder to confirm or deny transactions and recommends designating the secondary user as authorized if the transactions exceed a predetermined threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional systems use account number only for transaction processing, then transaction processing is simple and fast, but the system cannot identify secondary card users and build credit history

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the user identification process into multiple components: device identifier detection, biometric data collection, machine learning analysis, and traditional account verification. This segmentation allows the system to accurately identify secondary users without completely redesigning the transaction processing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between the transaction system and user identification. The MLM analyzes device identifiers, biometric data, and transaction patterns to determine secondary user status, acting as a mediator that adds identification capability without directly modifying core transaction processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system monitors and analyzes transaction data to identify secondary users, then credit history building is enabled, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit history accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by collecting device identifiers and biometric data at the point of transaction initiation, before full processing occurs. The machine learning model is pre-trained with transaction patterns, enabling rapid secondary user detection without adding significant processing time to each transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial monitoring by focusing ML analysis only on transactions that exhibit secondary user patterns rather than analyzing every transaction in detail. This selective approach maintains credit history accuracy while reducing overall computational burden and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the system implements comprehensive fraud detection through MLM analysis, then fraud risk is reduced, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud riskVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the machine learning model continuously learns from transaction outcomes and fraud patterns. The system receives feedback from confirmed secondary users and fraud incidents, refining its detection algorithms over time to improve fraud detection while managing system complexity through adaptive learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it identifies secondary card users for credit history building, detects potential fraud patterns, and analyzes transaction behavior. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by consolidating multiple security and identification functions into a single unified model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11861613B2Systems and methods for identifying a secondary card user
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US11861613B2 patent drawing
  • US11861613B2 patent drawing
  • US11861613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may receive transaction information associated with a transaction, the transaction information comprising an account number associated with a first user. The system may determine whether the transaction is associated with a second user. Responsive to determining the transaction is associated with the second user, the system may transmit a first prompt to a first user device associated with the first user, the first prompt comprising a request to confirm or deny the transaction. The system may receive, via the first user device, a first user selection confirming the transaction. Responsive to receiving the first user selection, the system may determine whether the transaction exceeds a predetermined threshold. Responsive to determining the transaction exceeds the predetermined threshold, the system may transmit a second prompt to the first user device, the second prompt comprising a recommendation to designate the second user as an authorized user of the account number.