Secondary Control Device for Work Machine Error Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for work machines, such as motor graders, may malfunction or generate erroneous control information, leading to undesired movements that can damage equipment or property, and existing monitoring solutions require additional processing that can interfere with the main controller's performance.

Innovation Solution

A secondary control device that obtains main and monitoring information, uses reduced functionality processing techniques to determine critical errors, and selects appropriate control techniques to manage the implement, allowing for efficient error detection and control without interfering with the main controller's operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a self-monitor is implemented to monitor the validity of controller instructions, then the reliability of control information is improved, but the device complexity increases and processing time is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidity of control informationVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a duplicate copy of the critical processing logic within the monitoring circuit. The monitoring circuit independently executes the same processing algorithm on received data and compares its results with the controller's output. This copying approach enables reliability verification without requiring complex communication protocols or additional sophisticated components, thus improving reliability while controlling system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring circuit acts as an intermediary between the controller and the actuator. It receives both the controller's output signals and the original input data, performs independent verification, and then determines whether to pass through the control signals or block them based on validation results. This intermediary role enables reliability monitoring while maintaining a relatively simple system architecture compared to more invasive monitoring approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If simulation parameter processing is performed to monitor controller validity, then the reliability of control information is improved, but the processing time increases and acceleration performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidity of control informationVSAvoidacceleration performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring circuit performs preliminary verification of control information validity in parallel with the controller's normal operation. By continuously monitoring and validating data as it flows through the system rather than performing post-processing simulation checks, the system ensures reliability without adding sequential processing delays that would impact acceleration performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring circuit performs only the essential verification steps needed to detect invalid control information, rather than executing a complete simulation of the control algorithm. This partial action approach focuses on critical validation points (comparing controller output with expected results based on input data) without replicating all processing steps, thus maintaining reliability while minimizing processing time overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the controller processes simulation parameters for self-monitoring, then the reliability of control information is improved, but the productivity of the controller decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidity of control informationVSAvoidcontroller processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring function from the main controller's processing tasks. The monitoring circuit is implemented as a separate, dedicated component that independently validates control information without burdening the main controller. This segmentation allows the controller to focus on primary control functions and maintain high processing efficiency while the monitoring circuit handles validation in parallel, thus improving reliability without reducing controller productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring circuit serves as an intermediary layer that handles the overhead of reliability verification. By offloading the simulation parameter processing and validation tasks to this intermediate component, the main controller avoids the productivity loss that would result from handling monitoring tasks itself. The intermediary monitoring circuit processes validation data in parallel, ensuring reliability while preserving the controller's processing efficiency for primary control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11274421B2Efficient secondary control device for a work machine
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US11274421B2 patent drawing
  • US11274421B2 patent drawing
  • US11274421B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secondary control device may obtain main control information regarding an implement. The secondary control device may obtain monitoring information regarding the implement. The secondary control device may determine, using a first reduced functionality processing technique, secondary control information regarding the implement based on the monitoring information. The secondary control device may determine, using a second functionality processing technique, based on the main control information, the monitoring information, or the secondary control information, that a critical error associated with the implement has occurred. The secondary control device may determine a circumstance associated with the critical error. The secondary control device may select, based on determining the circumstance, a control technique and may control the implement using the control technique.