Secondary Memory Interface for Robust Diagnostics and Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing memory systems face issues with communication failures at the interface, leading to unreliable connectivity and inability to diagnose and resolve issues due to the lack of a robust secondary communication path, resulting in potential system shutdowns.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a secondary interface with a simpler and more robust communication protocol alongside the primary interface, allowing the host system to diagnose and resolve issues by querying the memory system for diagnostic information and transmitting control commands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a primary interface is used for communication between host system and memory system, then data transmission speed and bandwidth are improved, but reliability deteriorates due to communication failures and inability to diagnose issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission speedVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The communication interface is segmented into two independent paths: a primary interface for high-speed data transmission and a secondary interface for robust communication and diagnostics. This segmentation allows each interface to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other, resolving the contradiction between speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary interface acts as an intermediary communication path that can be activated when the primary interface fails or requires diagnostic access. This intermediary path enables the host system to maintain communication capability and diagnose issues without relying solely on the primary interface, thereby improving overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a complex communication protocol is used at the interface, then data transmission efficiency is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to inability to troubleshoot and resolve issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission efficiencyVSAvoidtroubleshooting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The communication protocol is segmented into two distinct sets: a complex protocol for the primary interface optimized for data transmission efficiency, and a simpler, more robust protocol for the secondary interface optimized for diagnostics and troubleshooting. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high productivity while improving ease of operation through specialized simplified protocols for problem-solving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary interface uses a simplified copy of the communication protocol that retains essential functionality but removes complexity. This protocol copy enables the host system to query diagnostic information and send control commands without the complexity of the primary protocol, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining productivity through the primary interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If a single interface is used for all communications, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to lack of secondary communication path for diagnostics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface structureVSAvoidsystem connectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The interface structure is segmented into two independent interfaces: a primary interface for data transmission and a secondary interface for diagnostics and control. This segmentation increases device complexity slightly but dramatically improves reliability by providing a dedicated secondary communication path for troubleshooting and maintaining system connectivity even when the primary interface fails.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary interface is designed with multi-functionality, serving as both a backup communication path and a diagnostic interface. This universal design allows a single additional interface to provide multiple functions (redundancy and diagnostics), improving reliability while keeping the increase in device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250377974A1Secondary interface for a memory system
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250377974A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377974A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377974A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for secondary interface for a memory system are described. A memory system may receive a command via a first interface that comprises a first set of one or more input/output (I/O) pins and that operates according to a first communication protocol comprising a first modulation scheme and a first data rate. The memory system may receive, via a second interface that comprises a second set of one or more I/O pins and that operates according to a second communication protocol comprising a second modulation scheme and a second data rate, a request for information from the memory system based on receiving the command. The memory system may transmit, via the second interface and in accordance with the second communication protocol, the information based on receiving the request.