Secondary Propellant Autoignition Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional solid rocket propellants experience rapid overpressurization and destruction due to autoignition, which is not effectively controlled by existing techniques, leading to premature and violent reactions.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a secondary propellant with a lower autoignition temperature, such as a nitramine like nitroguanidine or cyclotrimethylene trinitramine, in contact with the main propellant near the motor casing, to manage heat generation and reduce reaction violence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a uniform thin coating of paraxylene polymer is deposited over the propellant grain as an ignition inhibitor, then autoignition is delayed, but the coating complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautoignition controlVSAvoidcoating complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the ignition inhibition function from a complex coating system and relocates it to a secondary propellant component. The secondary propellant, containing nitramine and binder, is positioned in contact with the main propellant near the motor casing, where it performs the ignition control function through its lower autoignition temperature, eliminating the need for complex polymer coatings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary propellant acts as an intermediary between the main propellant and the motor casing. It mediates the thermal interaction by absorbing and redistributing heat, preventing direct heat transfer from the casing to the main propellant, and controlling the autoignition process through its specific combustion characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a second propellant enclosing the first propellant is used as a barrier, then autoignition is controlled, but the device complexity and structural requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautoignition controlVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of enclosing the entire first propellant, the invention applies the secondary propellant locally in specific regions where heat transfer is most critical. The secondary propellant is positioned in contact with the main propellant near the motor casing, providing targeted thermal management where it is most needed, rather than requiring complete enclosure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The propellant system is segmented into distinct functional zones: the main propellant for primary combustion and the secondary propellant for thermal management and ignition control. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally without requiring complex integration or complete enclosure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the secondary propellant is positioned to provide critical mass for heat generation, then reaction violence is reduced, but the positioning precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction violenceVSAvoidpositioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The secondary propellant is positioned in specific localized regions near the motor casing where thermal management is most critical. This localized positioning provides sufficient critical mass for heat generation and redistribution in the areas of highest thermal stress, reducing reaction violence without requiring precise positioning throughout the entire propellant grain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses partial action by positioning the secondary propellant only in the regions where it is most needed for thermal management, rather than distributing it uniformly throughout the entire propellant grain. This provides sufficient heat generation and redistribution capability to control reaction violence while reducing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The secondary propellant system effectively delays and moderates the autoignition process, reducing the risk of premature overpressurization and allowing for controlled burning, thereby preserving the rocket motor hardware.

Implementation Method 1

The autoignition temperature of these propellants is controlled by the decomposition of ammonium perchlorate and the interactions of the decomposition products with the rubbery binder, that lead to porosity in the propellant grain. When autoignition finally occurs, around 450° F.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAutoignition: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

The autoignition temperature of these propellants is controlled by the decomposition of ammonium perchlorate and the interactions of the decomposition products with the rubbery binder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 3

The autoignition temperature of these propellants is controlled by the decomposition of ammonium perchlorate and the interactions of the decomposition products with the rubbery binder, that lead to porosity in the propellant grain. When autoignition finally occurs, around 450° F., the high surface area of the porous propellant causes rapid overpressurization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS9759162B1Controlled autoignition propellant systems
Publication Date: 2017.09.12 AEROJET ROCKETDYNE INC
  • US9759162B1 patent drawing
  • US9759162B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Solid propellant systems include a main propellant and a secondary propellant in contact with the first propellant that exhibits autoignition temperatures of at least about 100° F. lower than the autoignition temperature of the main propellant. The secondary propellant of the present invention is most advantageously employed with conventional AP-containing solid propellant formulations as the main propellant, especially formulations containing both AP, an energetic solid, and a binder. In especially preferred forms, the secondary propellant will include a nitramine which is at least one selected from nitroguanidine (NQ), cyclotrimethylene trinitramine (RDX) and cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine (HMX), and a binder which is at least one selected from HTPB, HTPE or glycidyl azide polymer (GAP). Most preferably, the secondary propellant will include a combination of nitramines which includes NQ and one of RDX or HMX.