Operational testing of autonomous vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing autonomous vehicle algorithms are inefficient and unsafe, as they require extensive real-world testing, which is dangerous and costly, and existing simulators lack the capability to realistically model interactions with other vehicles in a time-efficient manner.

Innovation Solution

The development of a simulation framework that enables 'super real-time' simulation of autonomous vehicle systems, allowing for the collection of data to improve algorithm training, sensor accuracy, and road data quality by configuring primary and secondary vehicular models with algorithms and trajectories, and integrating updated algorithms into autonomous vehicle systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-world driving environments are used for testing autonomous algorithms, then the testing realism and validity are improved, but the safety risks and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting validityVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of real-world driving environments, vehicles, and scenarios through high-fidelity simulation. The simulation system replicates physical laws, vehicle dynamics, and environmental conditions without using actual physical resources, thereby eliminating safety risks while preserving testing validity through accurate virtual modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional simulators are used to test autonomous vehicles, then safety risks are reduced, but the testing efficiency and realism deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety risksVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates diverse driving scenarios, environmental conditions, and vehicle behaviors before actual testing begins. Virtual vehicles and environmental elements are prepared in advance with predefined trajectories and interaction patterns, enabling rapid sequential testing without time-consuming real-world setup while maintaining safety through virtual containment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If more real-world testing is conducted to improve algorithm robustness, then the algorithm reliability is improved, but the time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm robustnessVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation system executes periodic, systematic testing cycles through diverse scenarios including normal driving, edge cases, and failure conditions. Multiple virtual vehicles simultaneously undergo repeated testing iterations across various environmental conditions, accelerating robustness validation through high-frequency periodic evaluation rather than slow sequential real-world testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If the simulation models include complex interactions with other vehicles and environments, then the testing realism is improved, but the computational complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation realismVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation system divides the complex driving environment into independent modular components: primary vehicle model, secondary vehicle models, environmental elements, and interaction physics. Each component is modeled separately with standardized interfaces, allowing realistic complex interactions to be composed from simpler validated modules, reducing overall computational complexity through systematic decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11169513B2Operational testing of autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 CREATEAI INC
  • US11169513B2 patent drawing
  • US11169513B2 patent drawing
  • US11169513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are devices, systems and methods for the operational testing on autonomous vehicles. One exemplary method includes configuring a primary vehicular model with an algorithm, calculating one or more trajectories for each of one or more secondary vehicular models that exclude the algorithm, configuring the one or more secondary vehicular models with a corresponding trajectory of the one or more trajectories, generating an updated algorithm based on running a simulation of the primary vehicular model interacting with the one or more secondary vehicular models that conform to the corresponding trajectory in the simulation, and integrating the updated algorithm into an algorithmic unit of the autonomous vehicle.