Secret Key Network Watermarking for Secure Image Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image watermarking methods lack security and detection guarantees, with traditional methods being insecure due to known linear embedding functions and deep learning methods lacking interpretability and statistical guarantees.

Innovation Solution

A novel framework using a secret key network (SKN) trained to output a standard multivariate normal distribution, employing an adversarial attack to embed watermarks, and utilizing two hypothesis tests for detection, ensuring security and robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional watermarking methods use known linear embedding functions, then detection performance has theoretical guarantees, but security is compromised due to the linear and known nature of the embedding function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performance guaranteeVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the embedding function from a known linear function to a secret key network with non-linear parameters. The SKN takes an image as input and produces a secret key signature through non-linear transformations, making the embedding function unknown to attackers while maintaining detection capability through the learned parameters of the network

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional linear mechanical embedding system with a deep learning-based non-linear system. Instead of using fixed linear operators, the system employs a neural network with multiple layers and non-linear activation functions to create the embedding, fundamentally changing the mechanism from simple linear algebra to complex non-linear computation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If deep learning methods use non-linear embedding functions, then detection performance improves, but the mechanisms become obfuscated and lack detection guarantees

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performanceVSAvoidmechanism interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a feedback mechanism through the loss function during training. The loss function compares the network output to the target secret key signature and provides gradient feedback to adjust the network parameters. This feedback loop ensures the network learns the correct non-linear transformations while maintaining a clear relationship between the embedding and detection processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the deep learning mechanism into distinct functional components: the secret key network for embedding, the hypothesis test for detection, and the loss function for training. This segmentation makes the complex non-linear system more interpretable by breaking it down into manageable modules with clear roles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If zero-bit watermarking methods are used, then imperceptibility and robustness are improved, but security weaknesses emerge with risk of counterfeiting and watermark erasing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimperceptibility and robustnessVSAvoidcounterfeiting risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite watermarking system that combines multiple protective mechanisms: the secret key network provides non-linear embedding, the secret key signature provides unique identification, and the hypothesis test provides statistical detection guarantees. This composite approach leverages the strengths of each component to achieve both imperceptibility and enhanced security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If end-to-end trained encoder/decoder frameworks are used, then the watermark embedding and detection mechanisms are integrated, but the learned mechanisms become obfuscated and difficult to interpret

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration of embedding and detectionVSAvoidmechanism interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the embedding function from the decoder part of the encoder/decoder framework and makes it independent. The secret key network serves as a standalone embedding function that can be applied to any image, separating the embedding mechanism from the detection mechanism while maintaining their integration through the shared network parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250336022A1Method and system for watermarking images, and method and system for detecting a watermark in an image
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
  • US20250336022A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336022A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336022A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for watermarking images includes providing a secret key network (SKN) that is adapted to output a standard multivariate normal (SMVN) distribution for a given input image distribution, applying an input image to the SKN, generating a secret key signature (SKS) as a real vector, and embedding a watermark in the input image by using an adversarial attack to modify the input image in a manner that aligns the SKN's output with the SKS. A computer-implemented method for detecting a watermark in an image is also provided.