Section Mill and Window Cutting for Reliable Wellbore Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for plugging and abandoning wellbores fail to provide a satisfactory seal due to leakage through voids and cracks in cement, especially when multiple casing strings are present, risking environmental contamination.

Innovation Solution

A milling system with radial cutout and window mills and section mills is used to cut and remove casing strings, employing pistons to extend and retract arms with ceramic or super-hard material cutters for precise cutting and stabilization, forming windows and sections in the casing to facilitate a secure plug and abandonment process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cement plugs are used to seal the wellbore with multiple casing strings, then the wellbore can be abandoned, but leakage occurs through voids and cracks in the cement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal integrityVSAvoidfluid leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes casing strings from the wellbore using a milling system with cutting arms that rotate to cut and extract casing sections. By taking out the casing strings that create complex geometries and voids, the patent eliminates the root cause of cement leakage pathways, allowing for a more reliable seal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary milling and removal of casing strings before setting the cement plug. This preliminary action creates a simplified wellbore geometry without casing obstructions, ensuring that the subsequent cement plug can be set without voids and cracks that would otherwise form around casing strings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If casing strings are left in place during abandonment, then the wellbore structure is maintained, but complete sealing cannot be achieved due to voids and cracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewellbore structureVSAvoidseal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts casing strings from the wellbore using a milling system that cuts and removes casing sections. This extraction eliminates the structural elements that create voids and cracks, prioritizing seal quality over maintaining the original wellbore structure during abandonment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary removal of casing strings before setting the final cement plug. This preliminary action ensures that the wellbore is prepared in advance to receive a continuous, void-free cement seal, rather than attempting to seal around existing casing structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional perforation and cement squeezing methods are used, then the process is simple, but satisfactory sealing is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabandonment process simplicityVSAvoidseal effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical perforation and cement squeezing system with a milling system that uses rotating cutting arms to physically remove casing strings. This substitution creates a more reliable seal by eliminating the source of voids and cracks, even though the process becomes more complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively seals the wellbore by ensuring complete removal of casing, reducing leakage and providing a reliable barrier against fluid migration, thus preventing environmental contamination.

Implementation Method 1

The arm may be operated by a piston to move between the retracted position and the extended position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic or pneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

employing pistons to extend and retract arms with ceramic or super-hard material cutters for precise cutting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP4296468B1Section mill and method for abandoning a wellbore
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
  • EP4296468B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4296468B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4296468B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

A method for milling a tubular cemented in a wellbore includes deploying a bottomhole assembly (BHA) into the wellbore through the tubular, the BHA comprising a window mill; and extending arms of the window mill and radially cutting through the tubular, thereby forming a window through the tubular, wherein a body portion of each window mill arm engages and stabilizes from an inner surface of the tubular after a blade portion of each window mill arm cuts through the tubular.