Sheet Metal Addendum Geometry Using Sectionless Elevation Curves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for designing addendum in sheet metal forming processes are labor-intensive, require complex sectional approaches, and are not easily adaptable to modifications, leading to inefficiencies in design and optimization, especially when dealing with large or complex components.

Innovation Solution

A sectionless approach using elevation curves (EC lines) to design the addendum, where EC lines are established based on the component and binder design, and spaces between them are filled to create the addendum geometry, allowing for parameterized filling techniques to ensure continuity and flexibility in design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a traditional sectional approach is used to design the addendum, then the addendum geometry can be created to connect the component and binder, but the design process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddendum geometry precisionVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The addendum design is segmented into multiple elevation curves (EC lines) at different heights, where each EC line represents a horizontal cross-section of the addendum. This segmentation allows the complex 3D addendum geometry to be constructed from simpler 2D circular profiles, significantly reducing design complexity and time while maintaining geometric precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from traditional 2D sectional views to a 3D elevation curve approach, where EC lines are defined in three-dimensional space. By using vertical elevation curves that extend from the component surface to the binder, the design process captures the full 3D geometry of the addendum, enabling more efficient parameterization and modification compared to multiple 2D sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the component design is modified using traditional sectional methods, then the addendum can be updated, but the entire design process must be re-initiated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign adaptabilityVSAvoiddesign efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The elevation curve approach creates a dynamic design system where EC lines can be independently modified. When component design changes occur, only the affected EC lines need to be updated rather than redesigning the entire addendum from scratch. This dynamic structure maintains adaptability while significantly improving productivity through localized modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The EC lines are pre-established at defined vertical intervals before the final addendum geometry is generated. This preliminary structuring allows for easy insertion, deletion, or modification of EC lines to accommodate design changes, enabling rapid adaptation without reinitiating the complete design process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If numerous vertical section lines are used to create the addendum profile, then the addendum geometry can be defined, but the complexity of inter-relating sections increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddendum fabricationVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple elevation curves are merged into a unified 3D addendum structure through surface generation. Instead of treating each EC line as a separate 2D section that requires complex inter-relating, the invention combines all EC lines into a coherent three-dimensional geometry, simplifying the design process while ensuring manufacturing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention elevates the design from 2D sectional profiles to 3D elevation curves, adding the vertical dimension to the traditional horizontal sectioning approach. This dimensional transition allows EC lines to naturally capture the vertical variation of the addendum geometry, reducing the need for complex inter-section relationships and simplifying the overall design process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11449646B2Sectionless addendum design
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 HEXAGON MFG INTELLIGENCE CANADA LTD
  • US11449646B2 patent drawing
  • US11449646B2 patent drawing
  • US11449646B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for the creation of an addendum for use in the design and production of sheet metal formed components, which method uses a sectionless approach. In a preferred approach, elevation curve (EC) lines are established relating to the component (ECc) and binder (ECb), and it is these lines which are used to design the addendum. Additional EC lines (EC1, EC2, EC3, etc.) can be added to modify or optimize the addendum design. The spaces between the EC lines are filled using various parameterized filling techniques so as to provide the addendum design. Optimization of the addendum can be achieved by modification of the various EC lines, so as to modify or control the various design parameters, in accordance with various quality or design criteria. A more rapid, and less complicated approach to addendum design is provided.