Secure AI Engine Evaluation with Sandboxed Data Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Advanced transformer-based AI models require significant computing resources and may operate slowly, and training them with proprietary data poses security risks, making them impractical for specialized tasks without human intervention.

Innovation Solution

A general-purpose transformer-based AI engine is used in a sandboxed testing environment to train and evaluate other AI models, restricting access to proprietary data, and a scoring engine assesses their output quality using a lighter and faster approach.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If advanced transformer-based AI models are used to train specialized AI models, then the quality and accuracy of training can be improved, but the computational resources required and operation speed worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining qualityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the training function from the heavy transformer-based AI model and implements it in a sandboxed environment. This allows the model to be trained using powerful external resources while the actual training process occurs in a controlled, lighter-weight environment that consumes fewer computational resources during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a sandboxed environment as an intermediary between the proprietary data and the AI model training process. This intermediary layer enables secure access to training data without requiring the model to directly process or store sensitive information, reducing computational overhead while maintaining training quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If advanced transformer-based AI models are used to train specialized AI models, then the quality and accuracy of training can be improved, but the operation speed worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining qualityVSAvoidoperation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The training functionality is extracted from the heavy transformer model and placed in a sandboxed environment, allowing the main model to operate faster while still benefiting from high-quality training data and processes during the training phase only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is segmented into a training phase (using sandboxed environment with full transformer capabilities) and an operation phase (using the lighter, faster specialized model). This segmentation allows each phase to be optimized independently for its specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If proprietary data is used to train AI models, then the model performance can be improved, but security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidsecurity risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A sandboxed environment serves as an intermediary layer between proprietary data and the AI model training process. This intermediary enables the model to learn from high-quality proprietary data while preventing direct access to sensitive information, thus maintaining security while improving performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The sandboxed environment implements preliminary security measures before the training process begins, establishing access controls and data protection mechanisms that prevent security breaches before they can occur during model training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Measurement precision

If human reviewers are used to train AI models for specialized tasks, then the quality control can be improved, but the cost and practicality worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality controlVSAvoidtraining cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The sandboxed environment enables the AI model to perform self-training using structured data and automated evaluation metrics. This self-service capability replaces the need for expensive human reviewers while maintaining quality control through programmatic assessment and feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The training process transitions from human-based quality assessment to automated metric-based evaluation. By changing the parameters of quality control from subjective human judgment to objective computational metrics, the system maintains quality assurance while dramatically reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250335813A1Secure Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence Engine
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US20250335813A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335813A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335813A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for the secure evaluation of an artificial intelligence engine are disclosed. A computer system transmits, to a testing environment by a scoring engine, a dataset associated with an input for an artificial intelligence model to execute within the testing environment. The scoring engine comprises at least one transformer. The computer system receives, by the scoring engine and from the testing environment, a response to the dataset generated by the artificial intelligence model. The computer system determines, by the scoring engine and based on the response, a score representing a quality of the response. The computer system generates, by the scoring engine, an output based on the score.