Secure Bidding Platform for AI Model Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bidding systems require organizations to share their data with bidders, compromising security and fairness, as bidders must access proprietary data to develop solutions, which is not feasible or secure.

Innovation Solution

A secure and fair competitive bidding system that enables bidders to develop solutions without direct access to the organization's data by using a model-to-data paradigm, where bidders create and submit data science models to a secure cloud platform for evaluation against common metrics, ensuring data security and fairness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If bidders are given direct access to the organization's data to develop solutions, then the quality and accuracy of bidder solutions improve, but data security and confidentiality are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution accuracyVSAvoiddata security risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary evaluation platform that acts as a mediator between the organization's data and the bidders. The platform receives data from the organization, evaluates bidder solutions against this data without exposing the actual data to bidders, and returns performance metrics. This intermediary system enables accurate solution evaluation while maintaining data security and confidentiality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the organization shares proprietary data with bidders for solution development, then bidder performance evaluation becomes more reliable, but fairness between bidders is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation reliabilityVSAvoidbidding fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation platform serves as a neutral intermediary that uniformly evaluates all bidder solutions against the organization's data without any bidder having direct access to the data itself. This ensures that all bidders operate under the same conditions and are judged by the same criteria, maintaining fairness while achieving reliable evaluation through centralized, consistent assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the evaluation process into distinct phases: data submission by the organization, solution development by bidders using only challenge specifications, centralized evaluation by the platform, and result reporting to bidders. This segmentation prevents any single bidder from gaining unfair advantage through data access while maintaining evaluation integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If bidders develop models without accessing the organization's data, then data security is maintained, but the ability to evaluate model performance accurately is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidmodel evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation platform acts as an intermediary that receives trained models from bidders, evaluates them against the organization's proprietary data in a secure environment, and returns performance metrics without exposing the data to bidders. This enables accurate model assessment while maintaining data security throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230259811A1Secure and fair competitive bidding
Publication Date: 2023.08.17 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20230259811A1 patent drawing
  • US20230259811A1 patent drawing
  • US20230259811A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There are provided a system, a method and computer program product providing a data-to-model challenge platform for enabling bidders publicly build, test, evaluate, validate and optimize AI models on proprietary data while at the same time avoiding the need to grant them access to the data itself. Rather, the bidder develops analytics on the enterprise’s data to solve a task desirable to the organization and submits the analytics for evaluation against other bidders. The offering organization evaluates all submissions from the bidders and rank submissions against each other using the same metrics, wherein the metrics for selecting the winning bidder can include response time, number and rate of attempts to solve the analytics, quality of results, code compactness, team size etc. Allowing the submissions of the bidders to be visible only to the offering organization can occur subject to an agreement that the offering organization and the bidder sign.