Secure Push-On Bottle Cap With Snap-Flange Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing secure cap technologies for bottles, such as tamper-proof caps, either prevent reattachment or are difficult to remove, leading to usability issues when consumers inadvertently remove the cap, potentially rendering the bottle unusable or causing leakage.

Innovation Solution

A bottle with a secure push-on cap featuring engaging shoulders on retaining flanges and protrusions/recesses that snap into place to prevent removal, combined with a mechanism that limits rotation and includes an auxiliary flange to enhance retention, making it difficult for an average person to remove the cap without significant force, and designed to break or deform upon excessive force application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a tamper-proof cap with a frangible member is used to prevent reattachment, then security against unauthorized refilling is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates because the cap can be readily removed by users who wish to smell or check contents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against unauthorized refillingVSAvoidease of cap removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the retention mechanism from a frangible member that breaks upon removal to retaining flanges with engaging shoulders that require significant force to disengage. The retaining flanges are designed with elastic deflection characteristics, transforming the removal mechanism from simple breaking to forceful deformation, thereby increasing removal difficulty while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a screw-on cap with ratchet teeth is used to prevent removal, then security against accidental removal is improved, but device complexity increases due to the requirement for screw threads and ratchet mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against accidental removalVSAvoidcomplexity of retention mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the complex screw thread and ratchet tooth mechanisms from the cap design. Instead, it uses a simpler retaining flange structure with engaging shoulders that provides comparable security against accidental removal without requiring threaded engagement or ratchet mechanisms, thereby reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining flanges are designed with elastic flexibility, allowing them to deflect during engagement and provide a secure locking action through elastic recovery. This flexible design replaces rigid mechanical mechanisms like screws and ratchets, achieving secure retention with a simpler, more elegant structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Reliability

If a cap with retaining flanges that deflect and snap back is used to prevent removal, then security against unauthorized refilling is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates due to the precision required for engaging shoulders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against unauthorized refillingVSAvoidease of cap assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining flanges are designed with asymmetric profiles featuring specific engaging shoulders at predetermined positions. This asymmetric geometry ensures proper alignment and engagement between the cap and bottle neck, providing secure retention while being manufacturable using standard molding techniques. The asymmetric design guides the assembly process and ensures reliable engagement without requiring excessive precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The cap is securely retained on the bottle, preventing accidental removal and ensuring the bottle remains usable, while resisting removal attempts by most users, with the mechanism robust enough to withstand significant force before compromising functionality.

Implementation Method 1

the first and second retaining flanges deflect relatively to one another as they pass and snap back into place once they have passed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

one of the bottle neck and cap having a protrusion which fits into a complimentary recess on the other of the bottle neck and cap to substantially prevent relative rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interference fit: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

the cap having an outlet with a valve for controlling flow through the outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValve flow control: Valve

Data Source

PatentEP2451718B1A bottle with a secure cap
Publication Date: 2013.03.13 RECKITT & COLMAN (OVERSEAS) LTD
  • EP2451718B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2451718B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP2451718B1 patent drawingFigure 7A~7C

AI summary

A bottle (1) with a secure cap (7), comprising a bottle having an open neck (2) and a first retaining flange (3) around at least a portion of the neck; and a push-on cap (7) fitted over the neck (2), the cap having an outlet with a valve (32) for controlling flow through the outlet and a second retaining flange (9) positioned so that, upon placement of the cap (7) on the bottle (1), the first and second retaining flanges (3,9) deflect relatively to one another as they pass and snap back into place once they have passed with a shoulder (41) of the first retaining flange engaging a shoulder (131) on the second retaining flange to hold the cap securely on the bottle.