Secure Collaborative Editing via Component Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current distributed collaboration methodologies face issues with data security, privacy control, and ownership disputes in collaborative content creation, leading to potential data theft, bandwidth inefficiencies, and costly data transfers, as well as challenges in managing privacy and distribution of private content.

Innovation Solution

The system divides electronic content into constituent components with separate ownership and control for each author, using content identifiers and editing parameters to enable secure, efficient data transfer and collaboration, allowing for individualized privacy and security controls, and minimizing data transfers by only sending updates rather than entire files.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If content is divided into constituent components with separate ownership, then data security and privacy control are improved, but device complexity and system architecture become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides electronic content into constituent components, each with separate ownership and control attributes. This segmentation allows individual authors to maintain privacy control over their specific contributions while enabling secure collaborative access. The system tracks ownership metadata for each component, resolving the contradiction by structuring data security at the component level rather than requiring complex system-wide security architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If entire files are transferred back and forth between collaborators, then collaboration is simplified, but bandwidth usage increases and data transfer costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration simplicityVSAvoidbandwidth usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary portions of content (specific components or edits) for transfer between collaborators rather than moving entire files. The system identifies and transfers only the minimal data required for collaboration, such as specific component modifications or metadata updates, significantly reducing bandwidth consumption while maintaining collaborative functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If repeated compression and encryption is applied during distributed collaboration, then data security is maintained, but content degradation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidcontent quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies compression and encryption only once during the initial upload of content components to the server. Subsequent collaborative operations work with references or metadata rather than repeatedly compressing and encrypting the actual content data. This preliminary application of security and compression measures eliminates content degradation while maintaining data security throughout the collaboration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If all authors individually control the whole content, then each author's privacy control is improved, but collaboration efficiency decreases due to coordination overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy controlVSAvoidcollaboration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements differentiated control rights where each author has full control over their specific content components while having limited or no control over other authors' components. This local quality approach allows authors to exercise privacy control precisely where needed (their own contributions) without requiring coordination overhead for controlling entire files, thereby maintaining both privacy control and collaboration efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10339279B2System and methods for secure collaborative communication
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 MINDHIVE
  • US10339279B2 patent drawing
  • US10339279B2 patent drawing
  • US10339279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention generally relates to a tool for secure sharing and collaborative editing of content over a communication network. The invention provides systems and methods for dividing content into component parts of content data and/or editing parameters which may be individually attributed to their respective authors. Systems and methods of the invention relate to compiling content from these components for display or other output on a computing device. Content authors may retain ownership rights and privacy control over their individual contributions to collaborative content through selection of privacy parameters and distribution of volatile copies of content designed with optional copying, transferring, and/or viewing restrictions at an individual component level. By minimizing the number and size of data transfers necessary in the collaborative creation of content, systems and methods of the invention can also minimize security risks, data loss, and costs associated with data transfer over a network.