Secure Connection Data Reset Validation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in securing account contact information against repetitive, iterative, and high-volume attempts to alter security connection data, leading to potential fraudulent activities and increased costs for entities requesting confirmations.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a computing system with processors and memory to manage secure connection settings for multiple users, which conducts multiple trials to validate new values for these settings, tolls a trial count, and suspends trials when a predetermined condition is reached, sending a denial message and alerting the user to maintain secure settings against unassisted machine-conducted resets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple validation trials are conducted for each reset request, then security against fraudulent activities is improved, but processing time and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against fraudulent activitiesVSAvoidprocessing time for validation requests
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes a trial count limit before validation attempts begin. This preliminary parameter prevents excessive validation trials from consuming excessive resources, while still allowing sufficient trials for legitimate users to complete their reset process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of validation trials allowed based on the trial count parameter. By setting a predetermined limit, the system changes the parameter from unlimited to bounded, resolving the contradiction between security (needing multiple trials) and efficiency (needing to limit processing time).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple validation trials are permitted, then accuracy of contact information verification is improved, but costs for validation requests increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of contact information verificationVSAvoidcosts for validation requests
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-defines a maximum trial count threshold before validation attempts commence. This preliminary configuration ensures that sufficient trials are available for accurate verification while preventing unlimited trials that would incur excessive costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

By implementing a predetermined trial count limit, the system transforms the validation process from potentially unlimited to bounded. This parameter change maintains measurement precision (accuracy of verification) while controlling the loss of energy (validation costs) by preventing excessive retry attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250184318A1Systems and methods for restricting security connection data resets
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 TRUIST BANK
  • US20250184318A1 patent drawing
  • US20250184318A1 patent drawing
  • US20250184318A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system maintains values for secure connection settings for multiple registered users and restricts data resets. Upon receiving a reset request to reset the value of a particular secure connection setting for a specific user, trials are conducted each by: providing a reset tool to the requesting device for input of a requested new value for the secure connection setting; receiving the requested new value from the requesting device; and sending a validation request to a validation system, the validation request including, at least in part, the requested new value for the particular secure connection setting. If a reply from the validation system is deemed a repudiation of the requested new value, a trial count is tolled. If the trial count reaches a predetermined condition, trials are suspended, a denial message is sent to the requesting device, and the specific user is alerted of a attempt to alter their data.