Secure Data Transfer via Dual-Channel Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data transfer methods between user devices lack efficiency in enabling secure and user-friendly data exchange, particularly in scenarios requiring additional value-added services, and often rely on proximity-based communication protocols with limited range and security.

Innovation Solution

Establishing a second communication channel between data receiving and originating devices, utilizing different communication protocols such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, to facilitate secure data transfer and support value-added services like tipping, while allowing user input on the originating device for data completion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If proximity-based communication protocols are used for data transfer, then security is improved, but communication range is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer securityVSAvoidcommunication range
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The communication process is divided into two distinct phases: (1) initial device discovery and protocol negotiation using proximity-based communication, and (2) actual data transfer using established communication channels such as internet or mobile networks. This segmentation allows the system to benefit from both the security of proximity-based initiation and the extended range of network-based transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing device identity verification and communication channel setup through proximity-based communication before transitioning to long-range data transfer. This preliminary authentication ensures security is maintained even when data ultimately travels over extended distances via network infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional value-added services are integrated into data transfer, then service functionality is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice functionalityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal data transfer framework that can accommodate multiple service types (file transfer, payment transactions, data synchronization, etc.) through a common protocol structure. This multi-functionality is achieved by defining extensible message formats and service descriptors that allow new value-added services to be integrated without fundamentally changing the core system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing service configurations rather than hardcoding different service implementations. Service-specific parameters (such as payment amounts, file types, synchronization intervals) are transmitted as configurable data fields within the standardized protocol, allowing versatile functionality while maintaining a relatively simple base system structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If user input fields are displayed on the originating device for data completion, then ease of operation is improved, but data transfer time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser input convenienceVSAvoiddata transfer time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data population by automatically filling user input fields with pre-retrieved information (such as contact details, transaction histories, or previously exchanged data) before the user completes the transfer. This preliminary action reduces the amount of manual input required while maintaining user control over the final data submitted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the originating device receives real-time status information about the data transfer process and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the user interface. For example, if data is being transferred in the background, the system can update progress indicators and automatically complete transfers without requiring continuous user interaction, thus reducing perceived time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4160503A1User input during an electronic data transfer
Publication Date: 2023.04.05 APPLE INC
  • EP4160503A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4160503A1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4160503A1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Approaches for display of a user input field on a data originating device during a data transfer are disclosed herein. The data originating device can be positioned within a proximity of a data receiving device to initiate a data transfer between the data originating device and the data receiving device. A secure channel may be established between the data originating device and the data receiving device to exchange information related to the user input field in some embodiments.