Secure Display Buffer for Payment Terminal Mode Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing equipment used for confidential actions, such as financial or medical transactions, faces limitations in flexibility and security due to the trade-off between openness to user-friendly applications and security, where malicious applications can compromise the secure mode display, leading to uncertainty for users.

Innovation Solution

A secure display method that allocates separate areas of the screen to information from open and secure operating systems, with exclusive control by the secure operating system to ensure a secure visualization, using filtering and virtual or real video memory to prevent corruption and deception.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the equipment uses an open operating system to provide flexibility and user-friendly applications, then adaptability and ease of operation are improved, but security deteriorates because malicious applications can spy on and betray security processes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the equipment into two distinct modes: open mode for general applications and secure mode for confidential operations. This segmentation allows the system to provide flexibility through open mode while ensuring security through secure mode, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a secure element as an intermediary component that acts as a trusted mediator between the open operating system and security-critical operations. This secure element isolates security processes from malicious applications while still enabling secure functionality, thus maintaining both flexibility and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the equipment restricts execution to only signed applications to ensure security, then reliability is improved, but adaptability deteriorates because legitimate unsigned applications are also prevented from running

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidopenness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different quality requirements to different parts of the system: signed applications are required for security-critical operations, while unsigned applications are allowed for general-purpose tasks. This localized approach to application signing maintains security where needed without restricting overall system openness and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the equipment uses a graphic screen with displayed information to improve ease of operation, then ease of operation is improved, but security deteriorates because malicious applications can corrupt the display to deceive users about the active mode

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevisualizationVSAvoidtrustworthiness of display
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a secure display buffer as an intermediary between the open operating system and the physical display. This buffer is exclusively controlled by the secure element, preventing malicious applications from corrupting security-related display information while still allowing rich graphical visualization for user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to display control by introducing a secure display buffer that operates at a different level than the standard display buffer. This additional layer ensures that security-critical information cannot be corrupted by applications running in open mode, while maintaining full graphical capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If the equipment uses two separate screens for open mode and secure mode to ensure security, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidnumber of screens
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes a single graphic screen multi-functional by implementing mode-dependent display rules. The same physical display is used for both open mode and secure mode, with the secure element controlling what information is displayed in secure mode. This eliminates the need for separate screens while maintaining security through exclusive control of security-related display content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP1975840B1Security viewing method and device
Publication Date: 2018.09.05 COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE ET FINANCIERE D INGENIERIE INGENICO SA
  • EP1975840B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1975840B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1975840B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The method involves allocating two zones of a screen of a payment terminal to two sets of information using filters and a direct memory access (30), independently from an open operating system e.g. UNIX(RTM: powerful multitasking operating system), where one set of information is edited by a secured operating system. The two sets of information are transferred to the screen under an exclusive control of the secured operating system to produce a security visualization of the set of information. The two sets of information are combined using a real video RAM (34). An independent claim is also included for a device for securely visualizing information on a screen of a payment terminal.