Secure Distributed Control System with Reputation-Based Anomaly Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed Networked Control Systems (D-NCS) are increasingly vulnerable to cyber attacks due to advancements in networking and control strategies, lacking effective protection for control algorithms and requiring improved security measures to ensure reliable and trustworthy operations, especially in time-sensitive and safety-critical applications.

Innovation Solution

A secure distributed control methodology that detects anomalies, adjusts reputation levels, and controls interactions within the network to isolate misbehaving agents, using a linear consensus algorithm with embedded security mechanisms and recovery schemes to ensure convergence and robustness against malicious activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If distributed control algorithms are used to improve flexibility and robustness, then system adaptability is improved, but vulnerability to cyber attacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the distributed control network into multiple zones with different security levels. Each zone can be independently monitored and controlled, allowing the system to maintain flexibility while containing potential cyber attacks within specific segments rather than allowing system-wide compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary security monitoring layer is introduced between control nodes and the distributed control algorithms. This intermediary layer verifies the authenticity and integrity of control commands and data exchanges, enabling the system to maintain adaptability while filtering out malicious cyber attacks before they can compromise the control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If centralized supervisory nodes are added to monitor network activities and improve security, then system reliability is improved, but system complexity and single points of failure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each distributed control node is equipped with self-monitoring capabilities that allow it to independently detect and respond to security threats. Nodes can autonomously verify the integrity of received commands and report anomalies to neighboring nodes, eliminating the need for complex centralized supervisory infrastructure while maintaining high security reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed control nodes are designed with multi-functionality, serving both control operations and security monitoring roles simultaneously. Each node can act as both a controller and a security sentinel, reducing system complexity by eliminating dedicated supervisory nodes while enhancing security through distributed monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If current communication security measures are implemented to protect data transmission, then information security is improved, but protection of control algorithms from malicious attacks is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication securityVSAvoidcontrol algorithm security
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements preliminary verification mechanisms that check the integrity and authenticity of control algorithms before execution. Cryptographic signatures and hash verification are applied to control commands and algorithm updates in advance, preventing malicious attacks from compromising the control algorithms even if communication channels are partially compromised.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

Security verification and validation of control algorithms are performed before they are executed in the distributed control system. The system pre-loads verified control algorithms into secure memory regions and maintains integrity checks throughout execution, ensuring that even if communication security is breached, the control algorithms themselves remain protected from malicious modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9910982B2Large-scale, time-sensitive secure distributed control systems and methods
Publication Date: 2018.03.06 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV
  • US9910982B2 patent drawing
  • US9910982B2 patent drawing
  • US9910982B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Large-scale, time-sensitive secure distributed control systems and methods are disclosed. According to an aspect, a method includes detecting an anomaly at a module among a plurality of modules in a network. The method also includes adjusting a reputation level of the module associated with the detected anomaly. Further, the method includes controlling interaction of the module associated with the detected anomaly within the network based on the adjusted reputation level.