Secure Distributed Gambling Microprocessors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current casino gaming and gambling systems lack secure and tamper-resistant solutions for managing gaming operations, purse management, and reporting, particularly in remote and offline environments, which can lead to fraud and integrity issues.

Innovation Solution

A distributed gaming system utilizing tamper-resistant secure microprocessors with cryptographic capabilities, deployed in various form factors, that enables secure communication and management through a central gambling management system, ensuring the integrity of gaming operations and preventing fraud by using cryptographic operations and secure communication protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional casino gaming systems are used, then gaming operations can be conducted, but security and tamper-resistance are insufficient leading to fraud and integrity issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity and integrity of gaming operationsVSAvoidcomplexity of secure distributed system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the gaming operation into multiple independent microprocessor nodes, each capable of autonomous secure operation. These nodes are distributed across different locations and communicate through secure channels, eliminating the single point of failure and enhancing overall system security while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Cryptographic protocols and secure communication channels act as intermediaries between distributed microprocessor nodes, enabling trusted interactions without requiring direct physical connection or centralized control. This mediator layer ensures integrity and confidentiality while allowing the system to scale without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If centralized gambling management systems are used, then gaming operations can be managed, but vulnerability to fraud and tampering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention capabilityVSAvoidexposure to tampering and fraud
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized management function is segmented into multiple distributed microprocessor nodes that independently execute gaming logic and maintain local security. This distribution eliminates the single target that centralized systems present to fraudsters, as each node operates autonomously and requires coordinated compromise to breach the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Cryptographic security measures are pre-configured into the microprocessor nodes before deployment, creating inherent resistance to tampering and fraud. Digital signatures, encrypted communication channels, and secure key storage are established in advance, preventing attackers from exploiting vulnerabilities that would exist in traditionally configured centralized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Adaptability or versatility

If offline gaming capability is provided, then gaming can occur without central system connection, but maintaining security and fairness becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoffline gaming capabilityVSAvoidsecurity and fairness maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

All necessary cryptographic keys, security protocols, and gaming logic are pre-loaded into the microprocessor nodes before offline operation begins. The nodes are configured with sufficient security credentials to maintain fair and secure gaming independently, and can synchronize with the central system periodically to update credentials when connectivity is restored

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed microprocessor nodes autonomously maintain security and fairness during offline operation through self-contained cryptographic verification and local execution of verified gaming logic. Each node independently validates game outcomes and maintains secure state without requiring continuous external supervision, enabling true offline capability while preserving security guarantees

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9911274B2Secure distributed gambling using stand-alone gambling platforms formed by independently operating coupled pairs of gambling microprocessors and mobile computing devices
Publication Date: 2018.03.06 TAPCENTIVE
  • US9911274B2 patent drawing
  • US9911274B2 patent drawing
  • US9911274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secure distributed gambling system and method is described. The system includes a plurality of mobile computing devices and a plurality of secure gambling microprocessors. Each of the plurality of secure gambling microprocessors is coupled with a different one of the plurality of mobile computing devices to provide a plurality of secure stand-alone gambling platforms. A gambling management system is communicatively coupled with one or more of the plurality of secure stand-alone gambling platforms to maintain gambling integrity.