Secure Email System with Thread Opt-Out and Server Interception

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current email systems face significant security concerns, including virus attacks and spam, and lack effective tracking and archiving capabilities, making them unsuitable for secure communication and compliance with regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act requirements.

Innovation Solution

A secure email system that uses a server-based architecture to intercept and store emails in encrypted form, allowing recipients to retrieve messages through a link, with features like dynamic metadata, private and public message handling, and message threading, while maintaining end-to-end encryption and secure storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional email systems are used for communication, then ease of operation is maintained, but security threats including virus attacks and spam increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemail securityVSAvoidvirus attacks and spam
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the email message content from the traditional email transmission path by intercepting emails at the server level. Messages are removed from the standard email flow and stored in a secure database, separating the notification function (sent via email) from the actual message content (stored securely), thereby eliminating virus and spam threats from entering user networks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a secure email service system as an intermediary between senders and recipients. This mediator intercepts emails, stores them securely in an encrypted database, and provides controlled access to recipients through a web interface or client application, preventing direct exposure to malicious content while maintaining communication functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multi-layered protection methods are added to reduce spam and virus intrusions, then security is improved, but device complexity and infrastructure costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-spam and anti-virus protectionVSAvoidmulti-layer protection infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding multiple protection layers to the existing email infrastructure, the patent extracts the message content from the email transmission path entirely. By storing messages in a secure database and providing access through controlled interfaces, the system eliminates the need for complex multi-layer scanning and filtering infrastructure while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a secure copy of the email message content stored in an encrypted database, separate from the original email transmission. This copy can be accessed and managed securely without requiring the original email infrastructure to handle security functions, simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If email messages are tracked and archived for compliance with regulations like Sarbanes-Oxley and HIPAA, then reliability and compliance are improved, but loss of information and tracking accuracy worsen due to incomplete transaction records

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with regulatory requirementsVSAvoidtracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements comprehensive tracking of all message transactions including delivery status, reading status, forwarding, and deletion. This feedback mechanism ensures complete audit trails for compliance requirements by continuously monitoring and recording the state of each message throughout its lifecycle in the secure email system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The secure email service system provides multiple functions within a single platform: secure message storage, tracking, archiving, compliance reporting, and retrieval. This multi-functional approach ensures all compliance requirements are met through integrated features rather than separate systems, improving tracking accuracy while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If encryption and secure storage are implemented for email messages, then security is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to manual key management requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend-to-end encryptionVSAvoidmanual key setup and management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The secure email service system automatically handles all encryption and decryption operations without requiring user intervention. The service manages cryptographic keys, encrypts messages at rest in the database, and decrypts them for authorized access automatically, eliminating manual key management while maintaining end-to-end encryption security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9401900B2Secure electronic mail system with thread/conversation opt out
Publication Date: 2016.07.26 APPRIVER CANADA ULC
  • US9401900B2 patent drawing
  • US9401900B2 patent drawing
  • US9401900B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An e-mail system is disclosed that overcomes many deficiencies of, but is backward compatible with, existing e-mail systems. An exemplary method for communicating e-mail messages comprises receiving, at a server system, an original e-mail message associated with a unique message ID that is assigned by the server system. The method further comprises storing a distribution list associated with the unique message ID and a thread participation status indicator for each of the one or more recipients, and, in response to an opt-out request received from one of the recipients, updating the distribution list to thereby produce a modified distribution list that does not include the requesting recipient. The method further comprises receiving a reply e-mail message in the same thread, and sending the reply e-mail message based on the modified distribution list such that the reply e-mail message is not sent to the requesting recipient.