Secure Exchange Server Authentication for Online Fraud Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic communication methods are prone to human error and fraudulent attacks, with users often finding complex password routines inconvenient and increasing exposure to online fraud when reusing passwords across multiple accounts.

Innovation Solution

A method for secure electronic communication involving a networked secure exchange server with a client authentication interface that authenticates users through a two-step login process, allowing access to secure data exchange environments and logging communications, while enabling notifications and privacy-level dependent content sharing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex password routines are implemented to mitigate fraudulent attacks, then security is improved, but user convenience deteriorates and users may re-use passwords across multiple accounts

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is segmented into two distinct phases: initial registration with comprehensive credentials (username, password, security questions) and subsequent logins requiring only password and security response. This segmentation reduces the burden on users during routine operations while maintaining strong security during the critical authentication moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Security measures are performed in advance during the registration phase, where users set up their credentials and security questions. This preliminary action establishes a secure foundation that simplifies subsequent login operations without compromising security, as the heavy verification work was already done during registration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If users have multiple accounts to mitigate exposure to online fraud, then security is improved, but user convenience deteriorates due to managing multiple accounts

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidaccount management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides a universal authentication framework that can serve multiple purposes: initial account registration, secure login, and verification of external communication addresses. This multi-functional approach allows users to maintain a single account that handles various security needs, eliminating the requirement for multiple specialized accounts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If comprehensive authentication processes are implemented, then security is improved, but the complexity of the authentication system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system dynamically adapts its complexity based on the operational phase. During registration, the system comprehensively verifies multiple credentials. During routine logins, it dynamically simplifies to only require password and security response. This dynamic behavior maintains high security while reducing perceived complexity for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and separates the complex verification processes into distinct phases. The initial registration phase extracts and processes all comprehensive credentials, while subsequent login phases extract only the essential authentication elements (password and security response). This extraction reduces the complexity burden on users during routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If secure electronic data exchange environments are established for each organization, then security is improved, but accessibility from external addresses deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidexternal accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary verification process for external communication addresses. Before allowing external addresses to communicate with the secure environment, the system mediates by verifying and approving these addresses through a controlled process. This intermediary mechanism maintains the security of the closed environment while enabling controlled external accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10708301B2Method of, and apparatus for, secure online electronic communication
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 ALWAYS ORGANISED LTD
  • US10708301B2 patent drawing
  • US10708301B2 patent drawing
  • US10708301B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for secure electronic communication between one or more clients on one or more client computing devices. The method includes establishing a networked secure exchange server, where the networked secure exchange server comprises one or more secure electronic data exchange environments for communication between one or more clients. The method also includes providing, on one or more client computing devices, a client authentication interface operable to enable one or more authorized clients to access one or more of the secure electronic data exchange environments across a network, and enabling one or more of the authorized clients to exchange electronic communications through one or more secure electronic data exchange environments.