Electronic Grievance System for Secure Facility Request Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Secure facilities face inefficiencies in processing and managing resident requests due to time-consuming manual processes and potential legal ramifications, along with the complexity of involving third parties for impartial handling.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for processing secure facility resident requests, including selecting request types, providing customizable request forms, routing them for review, and ensuring timely follow-up information collection, integrated with an electronic system that tracks, audits, and minimizes paper-based processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processing methods are used for resident requests, then staff can handle each request personally, but staff time consumption increases and processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest processing efficiencyVSAvoidstaff time consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables residents to self-file requests through electronic forms, eliminating the need for staff to manually collect and initial each request. The automated notification system also allows residents to self-track their request status, reducing staff administrative burden while maintaining service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual paper-based request handling with an electronic system that uses computers, networks, and automated notification devices. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with electronic automation directly improves processing efficiency and reduces staff time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If third parties are involved for impartial handling of requests, then fairness and impartiality are ensured, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpartial handlingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an automated electronic notification and tracking system as an intermediary between residents and facility staff. This intermediary ensures impartial handling by automatically routing notifications and tracking requests without human bias, while the centralized database maintains transparency and accountability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic request system serves multiple functions: it files requests, tracks status, sends notifications, and maintains records all within a single integrated platform. This multi-functionality ensures impartial handling through automation while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate systems or third-party interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If paper-based request forms are used, then simple filing is possible, but tracking and auditing becomes difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest filing simplicityVSAvoidtracking and auditing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates electronic copies of request forms that are automatically stored in a centralized database. These digital copies enable easy tracking, auditing, and retrieval without replacing the simplicity of electronic filing. The automated notification system also creates copies of status updates that are sent to residents, ensuring information retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Loss of information

If manual tracking of request status is implemented, then residents can be kept informed, but staff workload increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest status communicationVSAvoidstaff workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where request status updates are automatically notified to residents through electronic devices. This feedback mechanism keeps residents informed without requiring staff to manually communicate each status change, thereby reducing staff workload while maintaining information flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual status tracking and communication with an automated electronic system that uses computers and notification devices. This substitution eliminates the need for staff to manually track and communicate each request status, significantly reducing their workload while ensuring residents receive timely updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10726365B2Secure facility resident grievance/request filing system
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 INTELMATE LLC
  • US10726365B2 patent drawing
  • US10726365B2 patent drawing
  • US10726365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exemplary embodiment provides for a computer-implemented method for processing a secure facility resident request. The method includes accepting a request type selection by the secure facility resident, providing a request form corresponding to the request type, accepting input for the request form and routing the request form to secure facility staff for review. The method additionally includes routing the request form back to the secure facility resident if further information is required and if the further information is required, accepting the further information from the secure facility resident.