Secure Food Delivery Container with Hook Hanging and Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food delivery containers lack a self-locking mechanism to secure the contents after placement, and there is a need for a design that allows hanging from a door for access by delivery personnel while preventing unauthorized access.

Innovation Solution

A secure food delivery container with a hinged locking lid mechanism, hook members for hanging, and a locking mechanism with a key lock or key pad, featuring a note box for delivery instructions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a self-locking mechanism is added to secure food after placement, then security and reliability improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood securityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into separate functional components: hook members for suspension, a hinged lid mechanism for closure, and a separate locking assembly with key lock or keypad. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, achieving reliable food security while keeping individual components simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container is designed to be self-securing through the hinged lid mechanism that automatically engages with the locking assembly when closed. The hook members automatically suspend the container when engaged with the door structure, eliminating the need for manual locking operations and reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If hook members are added to hang the container on a door, then accessibility for delivery personnel improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery accessVSAvoidhanging mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hanging function is extracted as a separate feature through the hook members, which are distinct from the locking and insulation components. This allows the container to be suspended independently on door structures without complicating the core food storage and security functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The hook members serve multiple purposes: they enable suspension of the container on delivery doors, provide a means for the container to be easily retrieved by delivery personnel, and can potentially serve as attachment points for additional security features. This multi-functionality improves accessibility without requiring separate mechanisms for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a locking mechanism with key lock or keypad is implemented, then access control security improves, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess controlVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is implemented locally at the lid closure point, where it is most needed for security. The key lock or keypad is integrated into the locking assembly rather than being a separate system, concentrating the security function in one location and reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent offers alternative locking implementations including simple key locks or keypads that are more economical than electronic locking systems. These simpler mechanisms provide adequate access control security at lower manufacturing and maintenance costs, allowing the container to be produced more economically while still preventing unauthorized access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Temperature

If insulation material is added to maintain temperature, then food quality preservation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature stabilityVSAvoidinsulation structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container utilizes composite construction with an outer shell and inner liner separated by insulation material. This composite structure combines different materials (outer shell for structural integrity, insulation layer for thermal protection, inner liner for food contact safety) to achieve temperature stability while keeping each layer relatively simple in design and manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12419452B1Secure food delivery container
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 JOHNSON JAMIE
  • US12419452B1 patent drawing
  • US12419452B1 patent drawing
  • US12419452B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A secure food delivery container including a container assembly, a locking assembly and a hook assembly. The container assembly includes a rectangular insulated container with a hingedly attached lid. The hingedly attached lid is configured to close the container. The locking assembly includes a locking mechanism. The hook assembly includes a hook member. The hook member protrudes upward from the container. The hook member is operated to hang the container from the top of a door. The locking mechanism is configured to lock the lid with the container in a closed configuration.