Secure Messaging Interface with Automated Consent Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital messaging tools face challenges in ensuring strict compliance with regulations, particularly with sensitive information like medical data, as they often lack effective mechanisms for obtaining affirmative consent from end users, leading to potential violations and user experience issues.

Innovation Solution

A system that presents an interactive user interface to constrain customer users' actions until affirmative consent is received, allowing only standardized consent messages to be sent to end users, which are then updated to enable arbitrary messaging once consent is confirmed, ensuring compliance with regulations like HIPAA through automated consent management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If digital messaging tools are used to communicate with end users, then communication efficiency is improved, but compliance with regulations regarding sensitive information deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidcompliance with regulations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by obtaining affirmative consent from the end user before allowing any messaging. The user interface is configured to first present a consent request and only after receiving affirmative consent does it enable the messaging functionality. This preliminary consent acquisition ensures compliance with regulations like HIPAA while maintaining communication efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism - a consent management layer between the messaging tool and the communication channel. This intermediary consists of the user interface configuration that tracks consent state and controls message transmission, ensuring that sensitive information is only communicated after verified consent is obtained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If consent management mechanisms are added to ensure compliance, then regulatory compliance is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the consent management functionality directly into the user interface of the messaging tool. The user interface is configured to automatically track consent state and control message transmission, combining what would traditionally be separate systems into a unified interface that handles both messaging and compliance without adding significant complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by having the user interface automatically manage consent tracking and message transmission control without requiring separate complex compliance systems. The interface self-regulates based on consent state, eliminating the need for additional compliance infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If automated consent management is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but user input requirements deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiduser input requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by having the user interface automatically manage consent tracking and message transmission control without requiring separate complex compliance systems. The interface self-regulates based on consent state, eliminating the need for additional compliance infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the user interface continuously monitors consent state and adjusts messaging availability accordingly. When consent is obtained, the interface provides feedback by enabling the messaging function; when consent is not obtained, it provides feedback by disabling messaging. This feedback loop simplifies operation while maintaining compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12112855B2Secure messaging system with constrained user actions for ensured compliant transmission of medical information
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 INUNITY LLC
  • US12112855B2 patent drawing
  • US12112855B2 patent drawing
  • US12112855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for secure messaging with constrained user actions. An example method includes causing presentation of an interactive user interface, the interactive user interface enabling messaging with end users, each end user being associated with a respective phone number. Selection of a particular end user is received via the interaction user interface and the interactive user interface is updated to include a selectable option which triggers transmission of a standardized consent message to a particular phone number associated with the particular end user. A reply message is received from the particular phone number indicating the affirmative consent. The interactive user interface is updated, with the updated interactive user interface including an input portion configured to receive arbitrary information for transmission to the particular phone number.