Secure Social Network Content Evaluation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional communication systems in controlled environments, such as detention facilities, do not facilitate the sharing of user-generated content among multiple recipients in real time, and allowing access to electronic social networks poses safety and security concerns due to lack of individualized review and administrative oversight.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that receives, evaluates, and disseminates electronic content within a social network, allowing only appropriate content to be viewed by members while recording data on the process, with administrative control over membership and content, using modules for data reception, evaluation, dissemination, and recording.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If detainees are permitted access to electronic social network systems, then they can share user-generated content with multiple recipients and communicate without real-time availability, but safety and security concerns arise due to lack of individualized review and administrative oversight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent sharing capabilityVSAvoidsecurity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

An automated content evaluation module is introduced as an intermediary between content submission and dissemination. This module automatically screens all content before it becomes visible to other users, blocking inappropriate material without requiring manual review of every post. The intermediary system enables versatile content sharing while maintaining security controls through automated filtering and selective blocking capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional mail is used for communication in controlled environments, then security review can be conducted, but it results in slower communication and does not facilitate sharing of content with multiple recipients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reviewVSAvoidcommunication speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical mail review system is replaced with an automated electronic content evaluation system. The automated module instantly screens content submissions and makes approval or blocking decisions, eliminating the time delays inherent in manual mail processing. This substitution maintains security review functionality while dramatically improving communication speed and enabling simultaneous distribution to multiple recipients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If users are allowed to determine what content to post and with whom to share, then user autonomy is enhanced, but it violates controlled environment rules that prohibit communication with certain individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidrule violation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically evaluating and pre-screening all content before it can be posted or shared. The content evaluation module checks submissions against blocking criteria and facility rules in advance, preventing prohibited content from ever reaching users. This preliminary automated review maintains user autonomy for choosing what to post while ensuring rule compliance through pre-emptive blocking of inappropriate material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9832233B2Secure social network
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 INTELMATE LLC
  • US9832233B2 patent drawing
  • US9832233B2 patent drawing
  • US9832233B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for facilitating and securing the exchange of digital information between individuals within the social network of a person or group of people who are subject to security or law enforcement limitations or otherwise reside within a controlled or correctional facility. All submitted information requires administrative approval, either by a human administrator or an automated process, before it can be viewed by other members of the social network.