Security Access Control Alarm Classification Using Time Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security access control systems fail to differentiate between true and false alarms, leading to inefficient responses from security staff, particularly in scenarios where a loose door triggers false alarms, and are not cost-effective for large-scale implementations.

Innovation Solution

A security system that includes electronic entry means, a request to exit device, sensors to detect door separation, and a logic unit with a timer to classify alarms based on time thresholds, distinguishing between true and false door forced open alarms by determining the intent behind door openings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional security access control systems are used, then alarm detection is provided, but false alarms cannot be differentiated from true alarms leading to inefficient security staff responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm classification accuracyVSAvoidsecurity staff response efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces time as a new parameter for alarm classification. By measuring the time interval between door opening detection and door closing detection, the system can distinguish between true alarms (longer duration) and false alarms (shorter duration), enabling precise alarm classification and efficient security staff response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical alarm systems with an electronic system that uses sensors, timers, and logic units to detect and classify alarms. This substitution enables more precise measurement and classification of alarm conditions, improving both measurement precision and response efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If magnetic locks and contacts with different tolerances are installed to prevent loose door scenarios, then door security is improved, but the system becomes more complex and less cost-effective for large-scale implementations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a single sensor device that serves multiple functions: detecting door opening, detecting door closing, and providing data for alarm classification. This multi-functional approach maintains door security reliability while reducing system complexity compared to multiple specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex mechanical tolerances and multiple contacts, the system uses time parameter measurement to distinguish between door states. The timer measures the duration between opening and closing events, providing a simple yet effective mechanism for alarm classification without adding mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If a crash bar or shorter recovery period hardware is added to eliminate passive request to exit device, then door exit control is improved, but the system becomes more complex and costly for large-scale sites

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor exit controlVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical crash bars and passive exit devices with an electronic control system. The logic unit processes sensor signals and controls door access electronically, providing easier operation and exit control while reducing mechanical hardware complexity for large-scale implementations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system effectively differentiates true from false alarms, allowing for prioritized responses and reducing security staff workload, while being more cost-effective for large-scale installations by accurately classifying alarms and reducing false alarm triggers.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor device configured to detect an open door

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor detection:

Data Source

PatentUS8269602B2Security access control system and method for making same
Publication Date: 2012.09.18 HONEYWELL SECURITY AMERICAS LLC
  • US8269602B2 patent drawing
  • US8269602B2 patent drawing
  • US8269602B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A security system to identify a true door forced open alarm is provided. The security system includes an electronic entry means configured to allow access through a door. The security system also includes a request to exit device configured to indicate a request to exit the door. The security system also includes a logic unit configured to control access through the door and determine whether an open state of the door is allowed.