Security Agent Context Feedback for Threat Detection Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security systems lack sufficient context to effectively detect and respond to the growing variety of malicious activities, leading to inefficiencies in threat detection and potential false positives.

Innovation Solution

A security server collects and collates event reports from multiple computing devices to extract context information, which is used by a security agent to make informed decisions about protective actions based on historical data and organizational learning, enhancing behavioral threat protection and analytics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple layers of security apparatus and software are deployed to detect and repel security threats, then the detection capability against malicious software and network intrusions is improved, but the system complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity threat detection capabilityVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A security server acts as an intermediary between multiple computing devices and security agents. The server collects event reports from devices, analyzes them centrally, and provides contextual information to agents. This intermediary approach consolidates complex analysis functions at the server level while keeping client-side agents relatively simple, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive security detection and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The security server performs multiple functions including collecting event reports from various devices, analyzing events across the entire organization, generating contextual profiles, and distributing security guidance to multiple agents. This multi-functional centralized system improves overall security detection capability without requiring each individual device to implement complex security apparatus, thus addressing the contradiction between reliability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If security systems rely on limited local context information, then the response speed of security agents is maintained, but the accuracy of threat detection and decision-making deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoidcontext information availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The security server continuously collects event reports from computing devices, analyzes patterns, and feeds back contextual information to security agents. This feedback loop enables agents to make accurate threat detection decisions by incorporating organizational-wide context without sacrificing response speed, as the server pre-processes and distributes relevant contextual data proactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The security server performs preliminary analysis of event reports and generates contextual profiles in advance, before security agents need to make detection decisions. By pre-processing and distributing contextual information ahead of time, the system enables fast local decision-making with high accuracy, resolving the contradiction between response speed and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If security agents make decisions based solely on local event data, then the operational speed is maintained, but the reliability of protective actions deteriorates due to insufficient context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective action reliabilityVSAvoidinformation gathering time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The security server as an intermediary consolidates information gathering and analysis functions, collecting event reports from multiple devices and synthesizing organizational context centrally. This eliminates the need for individual agents to spend time gathering local context, as the server provides pre-synthesized contextual information, thereby improving protective action reliability without time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The security server performs preliminary contextual analysis and generates security profiles in advance, distributing this prepared information to agents before they need to make protective decisions. This preliminary action ensures agents have reliable contextual information ready when needed, improving decision reliability without incurring time delays during critical security events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12603896B2Agent prevention augmentation based on organizational learning
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC
  • US12603896B2 patent drawing
  • US12603896B2 patent drawing
  • US12603896B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, including collecting, by a security server, reports from multiple computing devices of events belonging to a set of specified event types occurring in execution of software processes on the devices, and collating the reports in the server to extract context information with respect to each of the events. Upon detecting an event occurring in execution of a process on a given device and matching one of the types, a software agent executing on the given device extracts, one or more features from the detected event, and conveys a query with respect to the detected event from the agent to the server. Upon receiving, from the server in response to the query, the context information with respect to the detected event, the agent decides to initiate a protective action on the given device based on the received context information and the one or more features extracted by the agent.