Security System False Alarm Reduction via Authentication Grace Period

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security and automation systems often trigger false alarms when individuals re-enter a property after initially exiting, leading to unnecessary emergency dispatches, as the system mistakenly identifies the re-entry as unauthorized.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that includes a processor-controlled security system which activates a first security duration after a predetermined time has passed since the initial exit request, and then initiates a second security duration upon detecting a re-entry event, during which a message requesting authentication credentials is broadcast, allowing authorized individuals to authenticate and prevent false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the security system immediately triggers an alarm upon detecting re-entry after exit, then the system maintains high security responsiveness, but false alarms increase due to authorized re-entries being mistaken for unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication verification before triggering an alarm. When re-entry is detected, the system first checks whether the individual is authorized through credential verification, and only triggers an alarm if authentication fails. This preliminary action prevents false alarms while maintaining security responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the alarm trigger decision is based on authentication results. The authentication outcome feeds back into the alarm decision logic, allowing the system to distinguish between authorized and unauthorized re-entries, thereby reducing false alarms and improving emergency dispatch accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system implements authentication verification for re-entry detection, then false alarms are reduced, but system complexity increases due to additional authentication protocols

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing authentication infrastructure already deployed for initial access control. The same credential verification mechanisms are reused for re-entry detection, eliminating the need for separate authentication protocols and minimizing additional system complexity while achieving reduced false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system leverages existing user credentials and authentication data that are already stored in the security system. By using self-contained authentication verification based on previously collected user information, the system avoids external dependencies and keeps the architecture relatively simple while improving alarm accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system provides a grace period for authentication during re-entry, then false alarms are minimized, but response time to actual threats is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a time-based periodic evaluation mechanism where authentication verification occurs within a defined grace period after re-entry detection. If authentication is not completed within this period, the system transitions from verification mode to alarm mode. This periodic action balances false alarm reduction with timely threat response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its response based on authentication progress. During the grace period, the system maintains a permissive state allowing authentication; if authentication succeeds, no alarm is triggered, but if the grace period expires without successful authentication, the system automatically transitions to an alarm state. This dynamic behavior optimizes both false alarm reduction and threat response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10431073B2False alarm reduction
Publication Date: 2019.10.01
  • US10431073B2 patent drawing
  • US10431073B2 patent drawing
  • US10431073B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for reducing false alarms related to security and automation systems. One method includes receiving a request to activate a security function associated with a automation system, initiating a first security duration after a predetermined time associated with the received request, detecting an occurrence of an event associated with the automation system during the first security duration, initiating a second security duration based on the detecting, and broadcasting a message requesting authentication credentials at a location of the automation system during the second security duration.