Automated Security Assessment Manager for Threat Quantification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise-level security systems face challenges in efficiently configuring and leveraging multiple security components to effectively detect and respond to dynamic threats, as current tools do not automatically provide the necessary information for SOC analysts to quantify their security systems' effectiveness and risk posture, leading to labor-intensive and potentially inaccurate assessments.

Innovation Solution

An assessment, recommendation, and mitigation manager is implemented to automatically evaluate the cybersecurity risk posture of an enterprise by analyzing threat landscapes, identifying vulnerable areas, and providing quantified scores and recommendations for improvement, using data models and machine learning to prioritize threats and optimize security system configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual assessment methods are used by SOC analysts, then flexibility in analysis is maintained, but labor intensity increases and assessment accuracy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual analysis flexibilityVSAvoidassessment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The security system performs self-assessment by automatically evaluating its own configuration, data feeds, detection rules, and response capabilities against the tracked threat landscape, eliminating the need for manual labor while maintaining comprehensive coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical analysis processes are replaced with automated computational systems that use algorithms and machine learning models to assess security posture, quantifying effectiveness across multiple dimensions without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive security monitoring is implemented across all enterprise systems, then threat detection coverage is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection coverageVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assessment manager serves multiple functions simultaneously: tracking threat landscapes, evaluating data feeds, analyzing detection rules, assessing response capabilities, and generating recommendations, consolidating what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single multi-functional platform

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The assessment manager acts as an intermediary layer between the complex security infrastructure and the threat landscape, abstracting and managing the complexity by providing a unified interface for assessment and quantification without requiring direct management of underlying system complexities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If automated assessment tools are deployed, then assessment accuracy is improved, but implementation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity posture quantification accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms qualitative security concepts into quantitative parameters by defining specific metrics for data feed effectiveness, detection rule performance, and response capability, enabling precise measurement and comparison through standardized parameters and scoring mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12107869B1Automated quantified assessment, recommendations and mitigation actions for enterprise level security operations
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 ANVILOGIC INC
  • US12107869B1 patent drawing
  • US12107869B1 patent drawing
  • US12107869B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic threat landscape to which computer resources of a specific enterprise are subject is tracked. Data feeds maintained by a security system of the enterprise are assessed. The effectiveness of data feed utilization by the security system is quantified, relative to the threat landscape. Threat detection rules deployed by the security system are assessed, and the effectiveness thereof by the security system is quantified. Processing capability of alerts generated by threat detection rules and threat response capability may also be assessed and quantified. The effectiveness of the security system as a whole is automatically quantified, based on the tracked threat landscape, the quantifications of the effectiveness of data feed utilization, threat detection rule utilization, processing capability of alerts generated by threat detection rules and/or threat response capability. Recommendations concerning more effectively protecting the enterprise against specific threats are output. Actions are automatically taken to mitigate specific threats.