Security Automation System Continuous Active Mode

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Security and automation systems often require manual intervention for arming and disarming, leading to inefficiencies and potential false alarms, which can deter users from activating the system due to inconvenience or fear of errors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a continuous active mode that automatically switches between 'armed away', 'armed stay', and 'standby' states based on user information and sensor data using a learning network to determine occupancy and activity patterns, reducing the need for manual input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual arming and disarming is required, then system control is straightforward and reliable, but user convenience deteriorates and unnecessary intervention is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects occupancy status using sensors and learning networks, then autonomously transitions between armed and disarmed states without requiring manual user input. The system serves itself by making intelligent decisions based on detected patterns of occupancy and activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary learning of user patterns and occupancy behaviors during initial operation, storing this information in a database. This pre-acquired knowledge enables the system to automatically make accurate decisions about when to arm or disarm, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system remains continuously active, then monitoring reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic sensing and evaluation cycles rather than continuous full-power operation. Sensors periodically detect occupancy, the learning network periodically evaluates patterns, and the system state transitions periodically based on these evaluations, maintaining reliability while reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational state between active monitoring and lower-power modes based on real-time occupancy detection. When no occupancy is detected for extended periods, the system can transition to a standby state with reduced energy consumption while maintaining the capability to quickly resume full monitoring when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Extent of automation

If automatic state switching is implemented, then user intervention is minimized, but false alarm risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where sensor data continuously feeds into the learning network, which compares current occupancy patterns against historically learned patterns. This feedback mechanism allows the system to distinguish between normal occupancy changes and actual security threats, reducing false alarms while maintaining high automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary learning and pattern recognition before making automatic state transitions. By accumulating and analyzing occupancy data in advance, the system builds a database of normal patterns, enabling it to make more accurate automated decisions and avoid false alarms caused by misinterpreting normal activities as security threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250095477A1Continuous Active Mode for Security and Automation Systems
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 VIVINT LLC
  • US20250095477A1 patent drawing
  • US20250095477A1 patent drawing
  • US20250095477A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for a security and automation system are described. A security and automation device, for example, such as a control panel may be configured to support a continuous active mode for the security and automation system. The continuous active mode may be a mode in which the security and automation system is continuously providing various types of security and automation features, such as monitoring, sensing, communication, notification, among other examples. The continuous active mode may also support active switching between multiple states (e.g., an ‘armed away’ state, an ‘armed stay’ state, and a ‘standby’ state) of the security and automation systems. Thus, irrespective of the different states the security and automation system may be continuously active (e.g., always ON).