Security Carrier Command Initiation via Dual Communication Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security information interaction systems face challenges in accurately and timely transmitting commands from security carriers to terminals, leading to inefficient resource consumption and limited flexibility in initiating processes.

Innovation Solution

Establishing a dual communication channel system where the security carrier can actively send commands to the terminal via a peer-to-peer and command/response mode, allowing for flexible and independent command initiation, including notification event messages and status indicating messages to manage session termination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the security information interaction terminal uses a periodical polling mechanism to continuously inquire the status of the security carrier, then the terminal can detect commands from the security carrier, but tremendous computing resources of the terminal will be consumed

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecommand detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by implementing event-driven communication where the security carrier periodically sends event messages (such as ETSI messages) to notify the terminal of command availability, replacing continuous polling. This approach maintains reliable command detection while significantly reducing terminal computing resource consumption by only processing communications when events occur.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional polling architecture by making the security carrier (rather than the terminal) the active initiator of communication. The security carrier proactively sends event messages to notify the terminal of commands, reversing the control flow and reducing terminal resource burden while maintaining reliable command transmission.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If the security information interaction terminal waits for commands from the security carrier, then the terminal can process commands when available, but commands cannot be transmitted accurately and timely since the terminal does not know the timing

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecommand processing capabilityVSAvoidcommand transmission timing

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the security carrier prepare and queue commands before the terminal needs them. Event messages are sent in advance to notify the terminal of upcoming commands, allowing the terminal to be ready for timely processing without continuous polling or waiting, thus eliminating timing delays.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the security carrier sends event messages to inform the terminal of command availability, and the terminal responds with status updates. This bidirectional feedback loop ensures accurate and timely command transmission by keeping both parties synchronized without requiring continuous active monitoring from the terminal.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the security carrier sends commands actively to the terminal, then the command initiation flexibility is improved, but a reliable communication mechanism is required to ensure accurate transmission

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecommand initiation flexibilityVSAvoidcommand transmission accuracy

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the command transmission process into distinct phases: event notification (announcing command availability), command data transmission (actual command content), and acknowledgment/confirmation (verifying successful reception). This segmentation allows the security carrier to initiate commands flexibly while maintaining transmission accuracy through structured, step-by-step communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an event message as an intermediary between the security carrier and the terminal. This intermediary carries metadata about command availability and initiates the communication sequence, enabling flexible command initiation by the security carrier while ensuring reliable transmission through a standardized intermediate format that both parties can process accurately.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10148765B2Security information interaction system, device and method

Publication Date: 2018.12.04 CHINA UNIONPAY

AI summary

The invention discloses a security information interaction system, apparatus and method, the method comprising the following steps: establishing a first communication channel and a second communication channel between a security information interaction terminal and a security carrier; the security carrier actively sending a command to the security information interaction terminal via the first communication channel and the second communication channel so as to complete a corresponding security information interaction procedure. With the security information interaction system, apparatus and method disclosed by the invention, the security carrier can send a command to the security information interaction terminal flexibly and actively on its own, and thus greatly improving the efficiency of the security information interaction system.