Integrated Security System Parallel Processing Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional security alarm systems face challenges in frequent software updates due to high costs and rigorous testing requirements, which affect reliability and certification, especially when adding feature-rich systems with larger processors and memory, leading to increased battery demands and complex backup circuitry needs.

Innovation Solution

An integrated security system that combines broadband and mobile access with conventional security systems, using a wireless gateway and iConnect servers to provide remote monitoring and control, enabling broadband access and reducing the need for frequent software updates by using a security coprocessor to manage power efficiently and support various wireless protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If feature-rich systems with larger processors and memory are added to conventional security systems, then system functionality and features are improved, but battery demands and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidbattery demands
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two separate processors: a conventional low-power security panel processor that handles core security functions, and a separate interactive processor that handles feature-rich applications. This segmentation allows each processor to be optimized for its specific function, with the interactive processor consuming power only when needed for non-critical features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interactive processor operates dynamically - it is activated only when interactive features are needed and enters low-power states when not in use. This dynamic operation allows the system to provide enhanced functionality while maintaining low average power consumption for battery-operated devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If feature-rich systems with larger processors and memory are added to conventional security systems, then system functionality and features are improved, but device complexity and backup circuitry needs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidbackup circuitry
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates security-critical functions (handled by the conventional panel processor with simple backup) from non-critical interactive features (handled by the interactive processor). This segmentation allows the backup circuitry to remain simple and focused on protecting only the essential security data and functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements selective backup protection - only the conventional security panel processor and its critical data are protected by battery backup and backup circuitry. The interactive processor and its data are not protected by backup circuitry since they handle non-critical features, thereby simplifying the overall backup infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If conventional security panels use low-power processors with small embedded software, then reliability and certification are improved, but software update frequency and adaptability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsoftware update frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The software is segmented into two parts: a certified, immutable security core that runs on the conventional panel processor and maintains reliability, and a separate interactive software layer that runs on the interactive processor and can be updated frequently without affecting certification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interactive processor can load and execute software copies from external storage or remote locations, allowing frequent software updates and feature additions without modifying the certified security core. This copying mechanism enables adaptability while preserving the reliability of the original certified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10223903B2Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture
Publication Date: 2019.03.05 ICONTROL NETWORKS INC
  • US10223903B2 patent drawing
  • US10223903B2 patent drawing
  • US10223903B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated security system that includes a security coprocessor coupled to a conventional security system panel and an interactive security system. The integrated security system enables conventional security system features as well as the consumer-oriented interactive features and functions of an interactive security system without sacrificing reliability or the significant burden and cost associated with frequent software updates associated with conventional security systems. The integrated security system also minimizes or eliminates the need for new battery backup circuitry or larger batteries.