Security Device Integration in Wet-Stage Paper Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for surface applying security devices to sheet materials during paper manufacturing either result in reduced durability due to fiber displacement or are limited by the thickness of the security devices, leading to issues with caliper differential and backside show-through, which affect the authenticity and processing of security documents.

Innovation Solution

Introducing a security device over 'soft-edged' through-holes formed in the fibrous web during the wet stage of paper manufacturing, allowing for thicker security devices to be applied without displacing fibers, thereby enhancing connective interaction and reducing caliper differential.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If security devices are introduced into the fibrous web during the wet stage of paper manufacturing, then embedded and partially embedded security devices can be applied, but the resulting sheet material is susceptible to reduced durability due to fiber displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity device application during wet stageVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by forming soft-edged through-holes in the fibrous web before introducing the security device during the wet stage. This pre-formed structure prevents fiber displacement when the security device is added, as the through-holes provide a predefined space that accommodates the security device without disrupting the fiber matrix. The through-holes are created using a patterned forming wire that removes fibers in specific patterns, establishing a framework that maintains sheet integrity while allowing security device integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If security devices are applied to a fully formed fibrous substrate, then surface applied security devices can be obtained, but the thickness of the security device is substantially limited to very thinnest devices

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidsecurity device thickness range
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by transitioning from surface-level application to volumetric integration. By introducing security devices during the wet stage when the fibrous web is still forming, the security devices become embedded within the three-dimensional structure of the sheet material rather than being applied only to the surface. This allows thicker security devices to be incorporated without creating excessive caliper differential, as the security devices are distributed throughout the sheet thickness during the forming process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If thicker security devices are applied to the surface of a fibrous substrate, then the caliper differential affects downstream processing, but thinner security devices are limited in their security functionality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity device thicknessVSAvoiddownstream processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating the security device into the fibrous web during the wet stage of paper manufacturing, before the sheet is fully formed and dried. This timing allows the security device to be integrated into the sheet structure when the fibers are still pliable and can accommodate the security device's thickness. By this stage, the sheet has sufficient structural integrity to handle thicker security devices without creating problematic caliper differential that would affect downstream processing such as winding, sheeting, stacking, and cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If security devices are introduced during the wet stage with insufficient consolidation, then fibers are displaced from sub-region and hinge areas, but with sufficient consolidation the security device can be properly integrated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnective interactionVSAvoidfiber concentration uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by forming soft-edged through-holes before introducing the security device. This pre-formed structure creates designated spaces that guide fiber distribution around the security device. The through-holes ensure that fibers are not randomly displaced but rather redistributed in a controlled manner, maintaining adequate fiber concentration in sub-regions and hinge areas. The soft edges of the through-holes, created by the patterned forming wire, allow fibers to gradually transition around the opening rather than being abruptly displaced, preserving connective interaction while achieving proper integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10562335B2Method for the surface application of a security device over a paper machine made hole
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 CRANE & CO INC
  • US10562335B2 patent drawing
  • US10562335B2 patent drawing
  • US10562335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sheet material having a security device applied over a paper machine made or ‘soft-edged’ through-hole and a method for preparing such a sheet material is provided. The through-hole(s) is formed in a forming fibrous web before it becomes sufficiently consolidated and then the security device is applied onto the fibrous web and preferably over the through-hole(s) at or near a couch roll or similar tool of a paper machine when the fibrous web constitutes a sufficiently consolidated, fully formed wet web. Moreover, papers made in accordance with the inventive method, when subjected to the Circulation Simulation Test, showed minimal damage at the paper/security device interface. Further, the surface-applied security devices showed acceptable levels of intaglio ink adhesion, and the papers had higher cross-direction (CD) tensile strength and much less show-through on opposing sides thereof.