Security Door Breach Training System Using Replaceable Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Public-safety and military personnel face challenges in training for forced entry into structures with security doors, as existing training methods are costly and inefficient, requiring destruction of actual doors and lacking realism.

Innovation Solution

A door breach training system that replicates a security door scenario using a frame member, elongate members, clevis members, retention bars, and retaining pins, allowing trainees to simulate the breach of a burglar bar door in a cost-effective and repeatable manner, with adjustable training parameters to simulate different bolt lengths and breach resistances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If actual security doors are used for training, then training realism is improved, but cost and resource consumption increase due to door destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining realismVSAvoiddoor destruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified training model that copies the essential features of a security door (frame member, elongate members representing bolts, clevis members, retention bars) without using actual doors. This allows repeated training scenarios without destruction, resolving the contradiction between training realism and cost loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The training system uses inexpensive, replaceable components (frame member, elongate members, clevis members) that can be easily replaced after each training exercise. This eliminates the need to destroy expensive actual doors while maintaining training effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If actual security doors are used for training, then training scenario accuracy is improved, but device complexity and setup cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining scenario accuracyVSAvoidtraining system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security door is divided into separate functional components: frame member, elongate members (bolts), clevis members, retention bars. This segmentation allows each component to be independently manufactured and assembled, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining scenario accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified training model that copies the essential features of a security door (frame member, elongate members representing bolts, clevis members, retention bars) without using actual doors. This allows repeated training scenarios without destruction, resolving the contradiction between training realism and cost loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If actual doors are used for training, then breach operation realism is improved, but productivity decreases due to time-consuming setup and destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreach operation realismVSAvoidtraining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The training system uses a simplified model that copies the essential breach scenario features without requiring actual doors. This enables rapid setup and repeated use, significantly improving training productivity while maintaining breach operation realism through the use of representative components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The training components (elongate members, clevis members) are designed to be easily assembled and disassembled. After each training exercise, components can be quickly recovered and reused, eliminating the time-consuming process of destroying and replacing actual doors, thus improving training efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS9569980B2Security door breach training system
Publication Date: 2017.02.14 BREACHING TECH
  • US9569980B2 patent drawing
  • US9569980B2 patent drawing
  • US9569980B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A security door breach training system comprising a frame member; a plurality of elongate members, each of the elongate members fixed to the frame member and having a free end spaced from the frame member, the plurality of elongate members including at least one capture member, a first clevis member, and a second clevis member fixed to the frame member opposite the first clevis member; at least one retention bar attached between two of the elongate members and spaced a distance from the frame member; and at least one retaining pin adjacent to the frame member, the at least one retaining pin comprising an elongate element at least partially adjacent to the frame member and having a first end and an opposing second end, a retaining pin socket attached to the elongate element proximal to the first end, and a stub extending from the at least one elongate element proximal to the second end.