Autonomous Security Drone Verification for False Alarm Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security systems face high rates of false alarms and privacy risks due to their reliance on static sensors and lack of integration with facility environments, leading to inefficient resource allocation and potential security breaches.

Innovation Solution

Deployment of autonomous vehicles, such as drones or ground robots, equipped with sensors and communication systems to verify alarm events, generate physical maps of facilities, and manage resource responses, thereby reducing false alarms and enhancing security integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous operation of cameras or microphones is used for monitoring, then security coverage is improved, but privacy risks and vulnerability to hacking increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidprivacy risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The security system transitions from continuous monitoring to periodic monitoring, where cameras and microphones are activated only at specific intervals or when triggered by motion detection. This reduces privacy intrusion and vulnerability to hacking while maintaining adequate security coverage through strategic sampling of the environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection using less intrusive sensors (motion detectors, door sensors) before activating more invasive monitoring devices. This preliminary action allows the system to determine whether full camera/microphone activation is necessary, thereby reducing overall exposure to privacy risks and hacking vulnerabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If all sensor reports are treated as actual events, then response reliability is improved, but resource allocation efficiency deteriorates due to false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse reliabilityVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where sensor reports are evaluated against historical data, environmental context, and multiple verification criteria before triggering a response. This feedback loop filters out false alarms while maintaining reliable responses to genuine threats, optimizing resource allocation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial verification to sensor reports, where only certain types of alerts require full response protocols. Less critical or potentially false alarms undergo lighter verification, reducing resource consumption on false positives while maintaining adequate response reliability for genuine threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If static sensors are used for monitoring, then system simplicity is improved, but adaptability to environmental changes and false alarm reduction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to environmental changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static sensor placement to dynamic sensor deployment, where sensors can be remotely repositioned, reconfigured, or activated/deactivated based on environmental changes and threat patterns. This dynamic capability improves adaptability while maintaining relative system simplicity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional sensors that can detect multiple types of events (motion, sound, light, temperature) and adapt their monitoring parameters based on environmental context. This universality improves adaptability to environmental changes while avoiding the complexity of deploying separate specialized sensors for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11591085B2Autonomous home security devices
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11591085B2 patent drawing
  • US11591085B2 patent drawing
  • US11591085B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerial vehicle is programmed or configured to respond to reports of events or conditions within spaces of a facility. The aerial vehicle travels to a location of a reported event or condition and captures data using onboard sensors. The aerial vehicle independently determines whether the reported event or condition is occurring, or is otherwise properly addressed by resources that are available at the location, using images or other data captured by the onboard sensors. Alternatively, the aerial vehicle transmits a request for additional resources to be provided at the location, where necessary. A map of the location generated based on images or other data captured by the onboard sensors may be utilized for any purpose, such as to make one or more recommendations of products that are appropriate for use at the facility.