Security Event Case Files from Correlated Unstructured Store Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retail environments face challenges in accurately identifying and responding to security events such as shoplifting, as existing systems rely heavily on subjective human observations, which can be biased and time-consuming, and lack efficient methods to correlate various data sources for objective analysis.

Innovation Solution

A system that correlates unstructured data from multiple sources, including cameras, RFID readers, and POS systems, using machine learning models to generate case files that objectively identify security events and automatically generate reports for security personnel, leveraging objective identifiers to minimize human bias.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If security officers manually monitor camera security systems and investigate security events, then they can identify potential shortages and security events, but the process is time-consuming and prone to human error and bias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of security event identificationVSAvoidtime required for security event investigation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human monitoring and investigation processes with an automated computer vision system. The system uses cameras to capture images, processes them through machine learning models to detect security events, and generates case files automatically, eliminating the need for security officers to manually review footage and reducing human error and bias in the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting security events, correlating data from multiple sources, generating case files, and preparing reports without requiring human intervention. The machine learning models independently analyze video feeds, RFID data, and POS information to identify security incidents and create structured case files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If security officers manually gather information for law enforcement reports, then they can provide detailed information about security events, but the process is time-consuming and subjective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of security event informationVSAvoidtime required for information gathering
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges and correlates data from multiple sources including camera security systems, RFID readers, and POS systems into unified case files. The system combines unstructured data (video images) with structured data (transaction records, RFID logs) to create comprehensive security event profiles that include all relevant information needed for law enforcement reports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting security events, correlating related data from multiple sources, and pre-generating case files before human review is needed. This preliminary processing includes automatically identifying security event categories, assigning objective identifiers, and structuring information according to law enforcement requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If the system correlates data from multiple disparate sources, then it can provide comprehensive analysis of security events, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of security event analysisVSAvoidcomplexity of data correlation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer consisting of machine learning models and data correlation algorithms that bridge disparate data sources. This intermediary layer standardizes data formats, correlates information across camera feeds, RFID logs, and POS systems, and transforms unstructured data into structured case files, managing system complexity through automated mediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by designing a multi-functional platform that handles various security event types (shoplifting, sweethearting, barcode swapping), processes multiple data source formats, and generates different output types (case files, law enforcement reports, internal notifications) through a single integrated architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the system uses objective identifiers to identify shoppers, then it can reduce human bias in security event identification, but the system requires additional data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity of security event identificationVSAvoidtime required for data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective human judgment with objective automated identification using machine learning models. The system uses camera images to automatically identify shoppers, correlate them with RFID and POS data, and generate case files without human intervention, ensuring consistent and unbiased identification while processing data rapidly through automated algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12536545B2Generating security event case files from disparate unstructured data
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US12536545B2 patent drawing
  • US12536545B2 patent drawing
  • US12536545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are systems and methods for generating security event case files with unstructured data. For example, the method can include receiving, by a computing system, unstructured data and system-based inferences from devices positioned throughout a store, and adding structure to the unstructured data and system-based inferences based on applying one or more structuring models. Adding structure can include labeling the data and system-based inferences, classifying them into security event categories, and identifying objective identifiers to identify users in the data and system-based inferences. The method also can include generating case files for each of the objective identifiers, where the case files include the associated data. The method can include determining whether the case files satisfy alerting rules. The case files can then be reported out and acted upon (e.g., based on satisfying the alerting rules) and/or stored for subsequent analysis and use.