Security Fence Panel with Inclined Intermediate Sheets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security fencing is vulnerable to damage from power tools like angle grinders, particularly with the increased availability of cordless models, and lacks effective anti-climb and projectile resistance.

Innovation Solution

A security fence panel design featuring mutually confronting security mesh sheets connected by inclined intermediate sheets, which transfer forces and enhance strength, combined with a loose connection to allow movement and prevent tool attachment, providing improved anti-grind, anti-climb, and projectile resistance properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If welded steel wire mesh is used for security fencing, then strength and anti-climb properties are improved, but vulnerability to power tools such as angle grinders increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidvulnerability to power tools
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fencing is divided into multiple horizontal panels separated by vertical intermediate panels. This segmentation creates multiple layers of resistance, where each panel must be breached independently. The intermediate panels are spaced 100-500mm apart, creating a segmented structure that prevents continuous grinding through the fence while maintaining overall strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a vertical dimension to the anti-grind protection by placing intermediate panels at different heights (100-500mm spacing). This vertical segmentation adds a third dimension to the traditional two-dimensional wire mesh, requiring the attacker to grind through multiple horizontal planes separated by vertical obstacles, significantly increasing the time and effort required to breach the fence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If mesh openings are made small for anti-climb protection, then climbing resistance is improved, but ease of manufacture and material usage are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-climb protectionVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-climb function is segmented across multiple horizontal panels with small mesh openings, while the intermediate panels provide additional separation. This allows each individual panel to have smaller, easier-to-manufacture openings while collectively providing strong anti-climb protection through the multi-panel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple intermediate panels are added to increase anti-grind protection, then resistance to power tools is improved, but device complexity and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to power toolsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a partial action approach by spacing intermediate panels at 100-500mm intervals rather than making the fence solid. This partial spacing provides sufficient anti-grind protection to prevent effective grinding while maintaining ease of manufacture and reducing material usage compared to a solid structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes the spacing parameter of intermediate panels to fall within the 100-500mm range. This parameter change creates the optimal balance where the spacing is large enough to allow manufacturing and material efficiency but small enough to prevent effective grinding through the fence, achieving anti-grind protection without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If security mesh sheets are spaced apart to reduce material usage, then weight and material consumption are reduced, but structural stability is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediate panels are pre-positioned at specific intervals (100-500mm) between the front and rear mesh sheets to provide preliminary structural support. This preliminary action maintains the spacing between mesh sheets while ensuring structural stability through the intermediate reinforcement elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The intermediate panels act as intermediary elements between the front and rear mesh sheets, providing structural connection and stability while allowing the sheets to remain spaced apart. These intermediaries prevent excessive movement and maintain the integrity of the spaced structure without requiring the mesh sheets to be in direct contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3980613B1Security fencing
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 GUARDIAR EURO
  • EP3980613B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3980613B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5B
  • EP3980613B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

A security fence panel comprising mutually confronting security mesh sheets which in use are spaced apart, the security mesh sheets being connected by intermediate sheets wherein in use the intermediate sheets are inclined to the horizontal and extend across the space between the confronting security mesh sheets.