Security Data Integration GUI With Event Mapping and Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of scaling cybersecurity threat detection capabilities to manage the increasing volume of security threats in cloud-based services without causing technical inefficiencies that hinder threat detection and response is a critical issue.

Innovation Solution

A graphical user interface and method for constructing and deploying a data integration between third-party security services and cybersecurity event detection and response systems, utilizing signal-specific data mapping containers and raw event simulation containers to validate and translate security events into technology-agnostic formats, enabling intelligent threat detection and response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If security operation services scale to mirror the growth of security threats, then threat detection capability is improved, but technical inefficiencies increase that slow down threat detection and response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoidthreat detection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data integration construction process into distinct modular components: integration identification parameters, signal-specific data mapping containers, raw event simulation containers, and deployment control elements. This segmentation allows each component to be independently configured, validated, and optimized, preventing technical inefficiencies while scaling threat detection capabilities across multiple security services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary validation through raw event simulation containers that test data translations before actual deployment. By performing preliminary actions including validating mapping instructions against expected event signal types and simulating raw events, the system ensures integration accuracy is established beforehand, avoiding downstream detection failures and improving overall threat detection reliability when scaled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple data integrations are constructed for different third-party security services, then adaptability of threat detection system is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration compatibilityVSAvoidintegration construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal integration construction framework that handles multiple third-party security services through common structural elements. The integration identification parameters, data mapping containers, and simulation validation mechanisms serve universal purposes across different security services, allowing the system to maintain adaptability while reducing the complexity of constructing and managing multiple integrations through standardized processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses templates and reusable configurations for data mapping containers and simulation validation setups. Once an integration is constructed and validated for one third-party security service, the same structural patterns, mapping approaches, and validation methodologies can be copied and adapted for other services, significantly reducing the complexity of creating multiple integrations while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If manual construction of data integrations is performed for each security service, then integration accuracy is maintained, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration accuracyVSAvoidintegration construction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the system automatically validates data translations through raw event simulation containers and provides feedback on integration accuracy. The simulation process automatically tests mapping instructions against expected event signal types without requiring manual verification, maintaining high integration accuracy while significantly reducing the time required compared to purely manual construction approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where simulation results validate whether data translations produce expected event signal types. This automated feedback mechanism confirms integration accuracy by comparing actual translation outcomes against expected outcomes, allowing rapid iteration and validation without manual intervention, thus maintaining precision while reducing construction time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12598199B2Systems, methods, and graphical user interfaces for accelerating a construction of a data integration for a non-integrated technology data source
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 EXPEL INC
  • US12598199B2 patent drawing
  • US12598199B2 patent drawing
  • US12598199B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method, and computer-program product includes displaying, via a data integration building user interface, a plurality of integration-identifying user interface input elements configured to receive one or more strings of text for specifying a set of integration identification parameters that characterize an in-development security integration for a third-party security service, displaying, via the data integration building user interface, a signal-specific data mapping container based on receiving an input selecting a signal mapping addition control button of the data integration building user interface, displaying, via the data integration building user interface, a raw event simulation container based on receiving an input selecting a simulation addition control button of the data integration building user interface, and displaying, via the data integration building user interface, an integration deployment control element that, when operated, transitions the in-development security integration to a deployed security integration.