Security Profile Comparison for Real-Time Product Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic product testing standards are rigid and lack opportunistic testing capabilities, leading to vulnerabilities in ecosystems due to unanticipated interactions and continuous product updates, necessitating a real-time security profile identification system for compliance.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic testing platform that enables standards, opportunistic, and continuous testing through anonymous reporting of vulnerabilities, using communication modules with stored protocols and a level identification system to compare security profiles and pledge profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rigid testing standards with defined procedures and facilities are used, then testing consistency and standard compliance are improved, but testing flexibility and ability to detect opportunistic vulnerabilities deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetesting consistencyVSAvoidtesting flexibility

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic testing platform that transitions from static, rigid testing standards to dynamic, adaptive testing procedures. The system allows testing parameters, protocols, and methodologies to be modified in real-time based on ecosystem feedback, vulnerability discoveries, and emerging threats, enabling both consistency through framework adherence and flexibility through adaptive execution

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables changes in testing parameters such as protocol selection, testing depth, vulnerability types targeted, and ecosystem scope based on current security conditions. Testing laboratories can adjust their testing approaches within the standardized framework to address specific ecosystem vulnerabilities while maintaining overall compliance standards

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive ecosystem testing is implemented to cover all product interactions, then security vulnerability detection is improved, but testing complexity and resource requirements deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvevulnerability detection capabilityVSAvoidtesting system complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive ecosystem testing into modular, manageable components. Testing is divided into standardized modules that can be independently executed and combined, allowing laboratories to test specific product interactions, vulnerability types, or ecosystem segments without overwhelming complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage through systematic integration of results

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates universal testing frameworks and protocols that can be applied across multiple products, ecosystems, and vulnerability types. A single standardized framework serves multiple testing purposes, reducing overall system complexity while enabling comprehensive ecosystem testing through reusable, multi-functional testing procedures

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If continuous real-time testing is performed to address dynamic ecosystem vulnerabilities, then security compliance monitoring is improved, but testing resource consumption and operational costs deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesecurity compliance monitoringVSAvoidtesting resource consumption

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic testing cycles that alternate between comprehensive ecosystem testing and targeted vulnerability assessments. Rather than continuous full-scale testing, the system performs testing at strategic intervals based on ecosystem changes, product updates, and threat levels, maintaining security monitoring effectiveness while reducing resource consumption during stable periods

Inventive Principle:

Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that trigger testing activities based on ecosystem events such as product launches, vulnerability disclosures, or security incidents. Testing resources are dynamically allocated in response to actual ecosystem conditions rather than operating at constant high levels, optimizing the balance between monitoring reliability and resource efficiency

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12413612B2Security identification compliancy system

Publication Date: 2025.09.09 IOXT LLC

AI summary

The present invention relates to a security profile identification system that compares security profiles created by standards associations which are derived from pledges and pledge profiles created by a level identification system that are also derived from pledges. The security profile identification system is smartly configured to compare the security profiles to related pledge profiles to determine product compliancy to the security profile.