Automated Security RFP Response System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solutions lack automation in responding to security/privacy-related request for proposals (RFPs) and information (RFIs), and there is no comprehensive system that combines auto-answering capabilities with IT compliance monitoring using artificial intelligence.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that automates the response to security/privacy RFPs by utilizing a multi-tenant web application, consulting various internal and external data sources, and monitoring compliance against security/privacy policies and controls, employing techniques like root question analysis, natural language processing, and classification algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processes are used to answer security/privacy RFPs, then accuracy and customization of responses can be maintained, but the process becomes laborious, time-consuming, and repetitive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSpeed of RFP responseVSAvoidComplexity of compliance monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively monitoring security/privacy compliance status and pre-preparing responses to common RFP questions before they are actually requested. Compliance controls are continuously assessed and responses are cached, so when an RFP arrives, the system can quickly retrieve and adapt pre-prepared responses rather than manually creating them from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating RFP responses based on its own monitoring of compliance status. The machine learning model processes compliance data and autonomously crafts responses to security/privacy questions, reducing or eliminating the need for manual intervention in the response generation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive compliance monitoring is implemented, then security posture improves, but the process of answering RFPs becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSecurity/privacy compliance monitoringVSAvoidTime required to answer RFP questions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors compliance status in advance and stores the results in a structured format that can be quickly retrieved when RFP questions are asked. This preliminary collection and organization of compliance data eliminates the need for time-consuming real-time assessments during RFP response generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of reviewing compliance documentation and crafting responses with an automated machine learning system. The ML model processes compliance data, understands security/privacy concepts, and generates responses automatically, substituting human manual labor with an automated intelligent system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated RFP answering is implemented, then productivity increases, but the ability to handle complex, customized security questions may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAutomation of RFP response generationVSAvoidAccuracy of security/privacy responses
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where compliance monitoring results are continuously updated based on changes in security posture, and the machine learning model learns from actual RFP responses and compliance assessments. This feedback loop ensures the automated system improves its accuracy over time by adapting to specific organizational contexts and evolving security requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model dynamically adjusts response parameters based on the specific compliance status, risk level, and organizational context. The system can modify response detail level, technical depth, and customization based on the particular RFP question and the organization's actual compliance state, ensuring accurate and appropriate responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10951658B2IT compliance and request for proposal (RFP) management
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 ONETRUST LLC
  • US10951658B2 patent drawing
  • US10951658B2 patent drawing
  • US10951658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for automating/streamlining the process of responding to a security/privacy RFI/RFP as well as monitoring the security/privacy/IT compliance of an organization are disclosed. For this purpose, a variety of data sources, internal and external to the organization, are employed. A set of machine learning algorithms are also used that find the most appropriate item in the database of data sources that match any given question/item of the RFP. Based on this matching, the RFP question is answered in an automated or a semi-automated manner. The compliance of the organization against a given policy or set of controls is monitored and any observed security/privacy gaps/risk are identified. Recommendations on overcoming the gaps are further provided to the organization.