Security Screening Integration for Multi-Mode Baggage Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current baggage handling systems are inefficient and costly, particularly for high-volume lodging entities like cruise ships, where manual processes consume valuable human resources and lead to data entry errors.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a baggage source message (BSM) to automate the baggage handling process, including matching passenger names, extracting IATA license plate numbers, and triggering a security screening integration assistant process to expedite luggage transfer between different modes of travel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual baggage handling processes are used at high-volume lodging entities, then employees can provide personalized service, but human resource costs increase and data entry errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata entry accuracyVSAvoidmanual process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing passengers to initiate baggage handling requests through mobile devices or kiosks. The automated system then processes baggage independently, matching it with flight information and generating tags without requiring manual employee intervention for data entry, thereby eliminating data entry errors while reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes with an automated computer-based system. Barcode scanners, mobile devices, and software algorithms substitute for manual data entry and baggage tracking, eliminating human error while simplifying the overall process through automation rather than adding complex manual procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If employees are cross-trained to handle multiple tasks including baggage processing, then flexibility increases, but availability for other passenger amenities decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemployee flexibilityVSAvoidservice availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated baggage handling system performs tasks that would otherwise require employee intervention. Passengers independently initiate baggage processing, and the system automatically matches baggage with flights, generates tags, and coordinates with airlines, freeing employees to focus exclusively on passenger amenities without compromising service availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary baggage processing actions in advance, including scanning, data capture, flight matching, and tag generation before employees are even involved. This preliminary automation ensures that when employees do interact with the system, they only need to perform final verification or exception handling, maintaining high service availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If traditional baggage tag printing is performed at each travel carrier, then each carrier maintains control over their process, but human resources are consumed and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebaggage processing efficiencyVSAvoidcheck-in time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary baggage tag generation and flight matching before the actual check-in process. Baggage is scanned and processed in advance, flight information is pre-matched, and tags are prepared ready for attachment, eliminating time-consuming manual processes at the check-in counter and improving overall processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal system that works across multiple travel carriers and modes of transportation. A single automated platform handles baggage processing for different airlines and carriers, generating standardized tags that work across the industry, eliminating the need for each carrier to maintain separate manual processes and reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If security screening is performed for each mode of travel separately, then security requirements are met, but processing time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity complianceVSAvoidscreening efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges security screening processes across different modes of travel. By integrating baggage data from air, rail, and other carriers into a single platform, the system enables consolidated security screening that meets all required standards while processing baggage once rather than multiple times, thereby improving both compliance and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal security screening platform that handles multiple modes of transportation through a single system. The same infrastructure screens baggage for air, rail, and other carriers, ensuring consistent security compliance across all modes while eliminating redundant screening processes and improving overall productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12272179B2System and method for security screening integration for multiple modes of travel
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 MATEER CRAIG
  • US12272179B2 patent drawing
  • US12272179B2 patent drawing
  • US12272179B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a system and method for security screening integration for multiple modes of travel, the method including: obtaining, by at least one of at least one processor, a baggage source message (BSM) associated with an arrival of a luggage item of a passenger, the BSM comprising travel data of a first mode of travel of the luggage item on an air carrier; matching, by at least one of the at least one processor, a passenger name of the passenger in the BSM with a passenger name in a manifest for a second mode of travel different from the first mode of travel; extracting, by at least one of the at least one processor, an International Air Transport Association (IATA) license plate number from the BSM; based on an identification of the second mode of travel and matching the passenger name in the BSM with the passenger name in the manifest for the second mode of travel, triggering, by at least one of the at least one processor, a security screening integration assistant (SSIA) process comprising accessing and assembling security screening image and related data captured during a first mode of travel security screen using the IATA license plate number and communicating the assembled security screening image and related data to an integrated security screening station; receiving, by at least one of the at least one processor, a response of a security analysis from the integrated security screening station for transfer of the luggage item to the second mode of travel; and causing, by at least one of the at least one processor, a printer device to print a marker configured to bypass security screening for the second mode of travel, wherein the marker comprises the results of the security analysis.