Centralized Security Service for Counter-Based Attack Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security measures in datacenters are inadequate in detecting and preventing brute force and denial of service attacks, particularly in complex network topologies with heterogeneous environments, as they often fail to consider the motivations behind these attacks and do not provide robust protection.

Innovation Solution

A centralized security service that detects and prevents attacks by using counters and thresholds to monitor authentication requests, connection attempts, operation loads, and network traffic, providing a holistic defense mechanism that adapts to different computing environments, including containerized and distributed applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a brute force detection mechanism is used to lock user accounts after incorrect authentication attempts, then some protection against attacks is provided, but the mechanism is inadequate and does not always avoid attacks or provide enough protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against attacksVSAvoidability to detect different attack types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The security service implements multiple detection mechanisms that serve different functions: brute force detection for authentication attacks, connection rate limiting for DoS attacks, and various counter-based detections for different attack patterns. Each mechanism is universal in that it can be applied across different services and attack scenarios, providing comprehensive protection beyond single-function brute force detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The security service segments attack detection into distinct mechanisms: authentication attempt tracking, connection rate limiting, operation counting, and various counter-based detections. Each segment handles specific attack patterns independently, allowing the system to detect and respond to diverse attack types simultaneously rather than relying on a single detection approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If existing security measures are deployed in complex network topologies with heterogeneous environments, then security coverage is provided, but the ability to detect and avoid rogue clients, applications, or users is challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoiddetection of rogue clients in heterogeneous environment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The security service acts as an intermediary layer between clients and applications/services. It intercepts and monitors authentication requests, connections, and operations before they reach target services, enabling centralized detection and analysis of rogue clients regardless of the heterogeneous network topology. This intermediary position allows uniform monitoring across diverse environments without requiring modification of individual services

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The security service implements feedback mechanisms where detected patterns (such as excessive authentication failures, connection rates, or operation counts) trigger responsive actions. The system continuously monitors security metrics and adjusts its behavior based on detected threats, providing adaptive security that responds to real-time conditions in complex network environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a centralized security service monitors authentication requests, connection attempts, operation loads, and network traffic using counters and thresholds, then holistic defense is provided, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholistic defense capabilityVSAvoidsecurity service structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security service merges multiple detection functions (brute force detection, connection rate limiting, operation counting, threshold-based detection) into a single centralized service. This consolidation provides holistic defense by coordinating all security mechanisms through one service rather than distributing them across multiple independent components, simplifying management while maintaining comprehensive protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The security service uses parameter-based control through configurable thresholds for counters (authentication attempts, connection rates, operation counts). By changing these parameters, the system can adapt to different security requirements and threat levels without structural modifications. This parameter-driven approach provides flexibility in managing security policies while maintaining a relatively simple service structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12488087B2Defending against computing attacks
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 DELL PROD LP
  • US12488087B2 patent drawing
  • US12488087B2 patent drawing
  • US12488087B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A security service for detecting and/or deterring computing attacks. A security service maintains counters related to different attack types for applications or clients including distributed applications. Information regarding requests received by the application are processed by the security service. When any of the counters exceed an associated threshold, an action can be performed in response.