Security Strap Core Sleeve Cutting Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional security straps are vulnerable to cutting, allowing thefts to be completed quickly, as they do not effectively resist cutting attempts, which hampers their practicality in securing baggage and light vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A strap design featuring a core within a flexible sleeve, where the core is resistant to cutting and not under tension, making it difficult to cut, with options including a planar body or metallic core with extensible springs, and a sleeve composed of braided yarns or multiple layers to complicate cutting attempts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional security straps are used, then the device is simple and easy to manufacture, but the strap is vulnerable to cutting and allows theft to be completed quickly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting resistanceVSAvoidstrap structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The strap is divided into two independent functional components: a flexible sleeve that provides tensile strength and a separate core that provides cutting resistance. The core consists of multiple planar bodies (at least three) that can be moved independently within the sleeve, creating segmented cutting resistance that must be overcome at multiple points simultaneously. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in its function without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The strap combines dissimilar materials with complementary properties: a flexible sleeve material (such as webbing or polymer) that stretches under tension, and a core made of rigid planar bodies (metallic or composite) that resist cutting. This composite structure allows the flexible sleeve to absorb tensile loads while the rigid core maintains geometric integrity and resists blade penetration, achieving both flexibility and cutting resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the core is made rigid to resist cutting, then cutting resistance is improved, but the core cannot bend around items for locking purposes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting resistanceVSAvoidflexibility for locking
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The core transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic assembly of movable planar bodies. The planar bodies are constrained within the sleeve to move only in the longitudinal direction, allowing them to flex and bend around locked items while maintaining their rigid cutting-resistant properties. This dynamic configuration enables the core to adapt its shape without compromising its cutting resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The planar bodies are oriented with their broad faces perpendicular to the strap's longitudinal axis, creating a three-dimensional structure within the two-dimensional strap cross-section. This orientation allows the planar bodies to resist cutting forces applied in multiple directions while their edges can flex and conform to the shape of locked items, effectively adding a dimensional aspect that resolves the flexibility contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If the core is under tension to strengthen the strap, then tensile strength is improved, but the core becomes easier to cut

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidcutting resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tensile strength function is extracted from the core and assigned to the flexible sleeve. The sleeve is designed to stretch and bear tensile loads, while the core is extracted from the tension role and dedicated solely to cutting resistance. This functional separation allows the core to remain in a low-tension state where its rigid planar structure is most effective at resisting blade penetration, while the sleeve handles all tensile loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible sleeve acts as an intermediary between the locking mechanism and the core. It transmits tensile forces from the locking mechanism to the core assembly without placing the core itself under significant tension. The sleeve's flexibility allows it to absorb and distribute tensile loads, protecting the core from tension-induced vulnerabilities to cutting while maintaining overall strap strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The strap significantly inhibits cutting, preventing complete severance of the sleeve and core, even if the sleeve material is cut, thereby enhancing security by making theft attempts impractical due to the increased resistance to cutting tools.

Implementation Method 1

the core comprises one or more extensible springs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring elasticity: Spring

Implementation Method 2

at least one elongate planar body with longitudinal flexibility but resistant to lateral flexure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric constraint: Geometry

Data Source

PatentUS10480218B2Security devices and straps therefor
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 ZEAL INNOVATION
  • US10480218B2 patent drawing
  • US10480218B2 patent drawing
  • US10480218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A strap for a security device has a core (12,62) within a flexible sleeve (14,64), and the sleeve is extensible independently of the core such that the core is not under tension. Because the core is not under tension, it is more difficult to cut and substantially inhibits, if not prevents, cutting of the sleeve. The core may take various forms which resist cutting in different ways. Examples are elongate, normally metallic planar bodies (12,34,38) having longitudinal flexibility but resistance to lateral flexure, and extensible springs (16,22,26). The sleeve (14,64) can also be designed to complicate any attempt to cut the strap as a whole, and may comprise multiple layers (76,78).