Security System Blocking Flanking Attacks via Dynamic Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional security systems face difficulties in detecting and neutralizing targeted attacks, particularly spear phishing, due to their reliance on known malware signatures, and are often distracted by decoy denial-of-service attacks, increasing the likelihood of successful targeted attacks on computing systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that detects denial-of-service attacks and infers secondary targeted attacks by enhancing authentication requirements through software-defined networks, adding a second authentication factor to protect sensitive computing resources, thereby preventing decoy attacks from succeeding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional security systems use malware signatures to detect attacks, then known malware can be identified, but zero-day exploits and targeted attacks cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidability to detect new attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system proactively increases authentication requirements for sensitive resources when a denial-of-service attack is detected, before the attacker can execute the secondary targeted attack. This preliminary security enhancement prevents the flanking attack strategy from succeeding by raising the barrier to access before the actual exploit attempt occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An authentication system is interposed between the network and sensitive computing resources when threats are detected. This intermediary layer verifies user credentials and can block access even if the attacker successfully compromises initial access points through spear-phishing or other targeted attacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If systems administrators focus on responding to denial-of-service attacks, then the decoy attack is addressed, but the secondary targeted attack succeeds due to administrator distraction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadministrator response capabilityVSAvoidprotection against targeted attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The security system automatically detects denial-of-service attacks and autonomously increases authentication requirements for sensitive resources without requiring administrator intervention. This self-service capability ensures continuous protection even when administrators are distracted by responding to the decoy attack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors network traffic patterns to detect denial-of-service attacks and automatically adjusts authentication requirements in response. This feedback loop enables dynamic security adaptation that operates independently of administrator attention or awareness of the ongoing attack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If authentication requirements are increased for all resources during an attack, then security is enhanced, but legitimate user access is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidlegitimate user access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Increased authentication requirements are applied selectively only to sensitive computing resources that are potential targets of flanking attacks, rather than uniformly to all resources. This localized approach maintains security for critical assets while minimizing disruption to legitimate user access of non-sensitive resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication requirements are dynamically adjusted based on detected attack patterns and threat levels. During active denial-of-service attacks, enhanced authentication is temporarily applied to sensitive resources, and then relaxed when the threat subsides, allowing the system to adapt security measures to current conditions rather than maintaining static high-security settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9225735B1Systems and methods for blocking flanking attacks on computing systems
Publication Date: 2015.12.29 CA TECH INC
  • US9225735B1 patent drawing
  • US9225735B1 patent drawing
  • US9225735B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for blocking flanking attacks on computing systems may include (1) detecting a denial-of-service attack targeting a computing network, (2) inferring, based at least in part on detecting the denial-of-service attack, a secondary attack targeting at least one computing resource within the computing network, (3) determining that the computing resource is subject to additional protection based on inferring the secondary attack targeting the computing resource, and (4) protecting the computing resource against the secondary attack by adding an authentication requirement for accessing the computing resource. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.