Security Tag Assembly Biased Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current anti-theft security tags are vulnerable to techniques developed by experienced thieves to remove them without damage or alarm activation, necessitating a more secure and adaptable solution for various types of merchandise.

Innovation Solution

A security tag assembly with a locking mechanism and release assembly, featuring a biased locking assembly within the base and an elongated connector pin, along with a release mechanism that includes interlocked, angularly disposed members, allowing authorized detachment without requiring a complete redesign of the tag assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional security tags are used with simple attachment mechanisms, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates as thieves can easily remove them without damage or alarm activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of attachment and removalVSAvoidsecurity effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The security tag is divided into separate components: a base unit and a detachable attachment member. The attachment member can be securely fastened to merchandise and later released through a specific release mechanism, providing both secure attachment and controlled removal capabilities while maintaining security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A release mechanism acts as an intermediary between the base and attachment member. This intermediary component requires specific activation (such as a tool or code) to disengage the locking mechanism, preventing unauthorized removal while allowing authorized personnel to remove the tag when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If security tags are made highly secure with complex locking mechanisms, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases making the overall system more complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the security tag into a simple base unit and a separate attachment member with integrated locking mechanism, the complexity is distributed. The base remains simple while the attachment member handles the security function, maintaining reliability without making the entire system overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The complex locking and release mechanisms are localized to specific components (the attachment member and its interface with the base) rather than being distributed throughout the entire tag. This allows high security functionality in critical areas while keeping other parts simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If standard security tag designs are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability deteriorates as they cannot be easily customized for different merchandise types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcompatibility with different merchandise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The base unit is designed as a universal component that can work with various types of attachment members. Different attachment members can be designed for specific merchandise types (clothing, electronics, etc.) while maintaining compatibility with the standard base, providing both manufacturing efficiency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The separable design allows the base to be manufactured once as a standard component, while different attachment members can be produced for different merchandise types. This segmentation enables customization without requiring complete redesign of the entire security tag system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively restricts unauthorized removal of the security tag from merchandise, allowing for easy authorized release while preventing unauthorized access, thus enhancing security without compromising the tag's compatibility with different types of products.

Implementation Method 1

a biasing mechanism structured to bias the locking assembly in a locked position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a detachment tool structured to engage the release mechanism and rotate it in a first rotational direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS8590348B1Security tag assembly
Publication Date: 2013.11.26 BRAEBUM ASSET HLDG
  • US8590348B1 patent drawing
  • US8590348B1 patent drawing
  • US8590348B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A security tag assembly structured to restrict unauthorized removal of merchandise from a designated area is presented. The security tag assembly comprises a base and a tag member removably connected to the merchandise being protected or monitored. A locking assembly is disposed within the base and is structured to be biased into a locking orientation relative to a connector pin of the tag member. A release assembly, also disposed within the base, is structured to facilitate the authorized release of the locking assembly upon contact with an externally applied detachment assembly. In particular the release assembly comprises first and second members disposed in a movable interlocked relation with one another, wherein the first member is structured to be rotationally disposed upon contact with the detachment assembly. The second member is structured for disposition into a displacing engagement with the locking assembly upon the rotational movement of the first member.