IT Security Testing Using Optical Device State Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing IT security tests face reliability issues due to devices becoming unresponsive and failing to provide expected data feedback, which compromises the integrity of the testing process.

Innovation Solution

An IT security test method that combines data feedback analysis with optical and acoustic detection of device states, using cameras and microphones to infer device conditions, and employs actuators to manage device states, ensuring continued testing even in the absence of data feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual security testing is performed by security personnel, then testing flexibility and complex attack scenario simulation are improved, but testing efficiency and resource consumption are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting flexibilityVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The security testing system is segmented into multiple independent components: vulnerability detection module, attack simulation module, traffic analysis module, and reporting module. Each module operates independently but coordinates through standardized interfaces, enabling both manual flexibility and automated efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary automation framework is introduced between manual security personnel and the target system. This framework includes pre-configured attack templates, automated traffic generation engines, and standardized test case libraries that translate manual testing intentions into automated actions, improving efficiency while preserving testing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive security testing is performed covering multiple attack vectors, then security coverage is improved, but testing time and system impact are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Security testing templates and attack scenarios are pre-configured and stored in a library before actual testing begins. Common attack vectors, test cases, and evaluation criteria are prepared in advance, allowing rapid deployment of comprehensive security tests without time-consuming setup during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system executes attacks periodically and systematically through predefined schedules and sequences. Multiple attack vectors are tested in organized waves rather than simultaneously, maintaining comprehensive coverage while managing time consumption and system impact through controlled periodic execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of information

If detailed test reports with extensive information are generated, then result comprehensiveness is improved, but information processing overhead is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresult comprehensivenessVSAvoidinformation processing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reporting system applies local quality by providing different levels of detail in different sections of the test report. Executive summaries provide high-level findings for management, while technical appendices contain detailed evidence and logs for security analysts. This differentiated approach ensures comprehensiveness without uniformly increasing processing overhead across the entire report.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and separates critical security findings from detailed test data. Key vulnerabilities, risk assessments, and recommendations are extracted and presented prominently, while raw test logs and detailed evidence are stored separately. This extraction approach maintains result comprehensiveness while reducing the processing overhead of presenting all information uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP4466623B1Method and system for performing an it security test
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 SIEMENS AG
  • EP4466623B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for carrying out an IT security test of a device. The method involves using a database having one or more device properties of at least the device and a set of individual test candidates is used, by means of which the IT security test can be formed, wherein the individual test candidates are specific for the one or more device properties. The method involves selecting those individual test candidates which are specific for the one or more device properties of the device, and the IT security test of the device is carried out with the selected individual test candidates as individual tests.