Self-Enforcing Security Token Smart Contract Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in ensuring compliance with SEC regulations during security token transactions, particularly in preventing transactions with non-qualified investors, which can result in fines and penalties.

Innovation Solution

A self-enforcing security token system that implements smart-contract-based compliance rules, referencing a global registry of investors, to automatically verify compliance with SEC regulations before executing transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual compliance verification is used for security token transactions, then compliance accuracy can be maintained, but transaction processing time increases and system efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance verification accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The smart contract automatically performs compliance verification by executing predefined rules and checking investor qualifications without requiring manual intervention. The system self-verifies whether transactions comply with SEC regulations by automatically querying the global registry and evaluating compliance conditions, thereby maintaining high accuracy while significantly improving processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Compliance rules are pre-programmed into the smart contract before transactions occur. The system performs compliance checks in advance by automatically evaluating predefined conditions and querying the global registry before executing transactions, ensuring compliance accuracy is maintained while enabling rapid automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive compliance checks are implemented for all transactions, then regulatory compliance improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidcompliance verification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance verification system is segmented into modular components: the smart contract handles transaction logic, the global registry stores investor qualification data, and compliance rules are separated as independent predefined conditions. This segmentation allows comprehensive compliance checks to be performed through multiple simple, independent verification steps rather than a single complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The global registry acts as an intermediary between the smart contract and compliance requirements. Instead of embedding all compliance verification logic directly in the contract, the system queries pre-stored investor qualification data from the global registry, simplifying the contract structure while maintaining comprehensive compliance coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated compliance verification is implemented, then transaction processing speed increases, but the ability to handle complex compliance scenarios decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing speedVSAvoidcompliance scenario flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance rules are designed to be dynamic and updatable. The system can adapt to changing regulatory requirements by updating the predefined compliance conditions in the smart contract without requiring code changes. This allows the automated system to maintain high processing speed while becoming adaptable to new compliance scenarios through configuration updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250173704A1Self-enforcing security token implementing smart-contract-based compliance rules consulting smart-contract-based global registry of investors
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 TZERO IP LLC
  • US20250173704A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173704A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173704A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A network node includes at least one processor, at least one memory, and at least one network interface. The network node is configured to be within a plurality of network nodes communicatively coupled in a peer-to-peer network of network nodes implementing a distributed ledger that cryptographically secures security tokens. The network node is configured to be communicatively coupled to at least one remotely located computing device through the at least one network interface. The at least one processor is configured to determine a split ratio for a new split of the security tokens held in at least one address of the distributed ledger. The at least one processor is also configured to store an indication of the split ratio without updating token balances for all of the at least one address in a list of addresses holding at least one of the security tokens.