Seed Variety Switching via Calculated Transition Distance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current planting systems are inefficient and inaccurate in automatically switching between different seed types during a planting operation due to difficulties in determining when a seed meter is empty, leading to inconsistent performance across varying soil types and management zones in a field.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that monitor the location of a row unit within a field, calculate a variety change distance based on transition and starvation distances, and control the seed supply to switch between seed types by terminating the supply of one type and initiating the supply of another at specific locations, ensuring efficient and accurate switching during planting operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If separate bulk fill hoppers are used for different seed varieties, then seed supply capacity is improved, but device complexity increases and switching between seed types becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseed supply capacityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the field into management zones with different seed variety requirements and segments the seed supply control by row unit, allowing different seed types to be supplied to different row units based on their location in the field

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-filling seed hoppers with different seed varieties before planting, and by pre-calculating the variety change distance and transition split percentage to determine when and how to switch between seed types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the reservoir is completely cleaned out before switching seed varieties, then seed mixing is prevented, but productivity decreases due to time loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseed variety purityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of the variety change distance and starvation distance before the actual seed switch, allowing the transition to be initiated at the optimal moment rather than waiting for complete hopper emptying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the seed supply transition based on real-time calculations of row unit location, variety change distance, and starvation distance, rather than using a fixed complete-emptying protocol

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If automatic switching between seed types is implemented, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision is insufficient to determine when the seed meter is empty

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidseed meter empty detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces intermediary calculated parameters (variety change distance, starvation distance, transition split percentage) that serve as mediators between the physical seed meter state and the control system, enabling automatic switching without direct real-time measurement of seed meter contents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations of the variety change distance and starvation distance before the actual seed switch, allowing the transition to be initiated at the optimal moment rather than waiting for complete hopper emptying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If seed switching is delayed until the seed meter is empty, then seed mixing is prevented, but loss of time increases during the switching process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseed variety purityVSAvoidtime loss during switching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of the variety change distance and starvation distance before the actual seed switch, allowing the transition to be initiated at the optimal moment rather than waiting for complete hopper emptying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the seed supply transition based on real-time calculations of row unit location, variety change distance, and starvation distance, rather than using a fixed complete-emptying protocol

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10674656B2System and method for switching between seed types during a multi-variety seed planting operation
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 BLUE LEAF I P INC
  • US10674656B2 patent drawing
  • US10674656B2 patent drawing
  • US10674656B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When performing a seed planting operation, a variety change distance may be calculated that corresponds to the distance from a variety zone boundary of a prescription map that a row unit of a planter must be located prior to initiating a variety change procedure for switching seed types. Once the row unit reaches a variety change boundary spaced apart from the variety zone boundary by the calculated variety change distance, a system controller may initiate the variety change procedure to allow the seed type being planted to be efficiently and effectively switched as the planter makes a planting pass across the field.