Seedless Mandarin Variety With Stable Morphology for Fruit Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mandarin varieties lack distinct and stable characteristics for efficient fruit production, particularly in terms of leaf and flower morphology, spine density, and petiole length, making them difficult to distinguish and manage.

Innovation Solution

Development of a new mandarin variety 'Mikanken15' through asexual reproduction, characterized by unique leaf blade ratio, short petiole length, and sparse spine density, differentiated from its parents 'HAREHIME' and 'SEINANNOHIKARI', with specific botanical features and fruit characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing mandarin varieties are used, then cultivation is simple, but distinct and stable characteristics for efficient fruit production are lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefruit production efficiencyVSAvoiddistinct and stable characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by selecting and fixing specific morphological parameters (leaf blade ratio length/width, petiole length, spine density) to create a new variety with distinct and stable characteristics. The new variety 'Mikanken15' exhibits specific parameter values: leaf blade ratio length/width of 2.0, petiole length of 1.3 cm, and absent or sparse spine density, which differ from parent varieties and provide reliable identification and management characteristics while maintaining high fruit productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If parent varieties with different characteristics are crossed, then genetic diversity is improved, but difficulty in distinguishing and managing the new variety increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenetic diversityVSAvoidvariety distinction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by emphasizing specific local characteristics (leaf blade shape, petiole length, spine density) that differentiate the new variety from its parents. Rather than considering all traits equally, the patent focuses on these particular morphological features as key identification markers, making the new variety easily distinguishable while preserving beneficial genetic diversity from both parent varieties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If selection and breeding processes are extended, then variety stability is improved, but breeding time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety stabilityVSAvoidbreeding time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting systematic selection and evaluation of breeding lines at multiple stages (primary selection in 2012, secondary selection in 2012, and DUS confirmation in 2024). This structured approach with predetermined selection criteria for key morphological traits allows for efficient progression through breeding stages, achieving variety stability without excessive time delay by preparing and evaluating multiple candidate lines simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUSPP37207P2Mandarin plant named ‘Mikanken15’
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 EHIME PREFECTURE
  • USPP37207P2 patent drawing
  • USPP37207P2 patent drawing
  • USPP37207P2 patent drawing

AI summary

A new variety of Citrus plant named ‘Mikanken15’ that has dark orange fruit color, without seeds, high juiciness, orange-like flavor, ease of peeling the fruit by hand, good appearance, and good tasting qualities.