Segment Comparison Interface with Relative Significance Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to efficiently and effectively differentiate and compare segments of end users for targeted marketing, as they lack adequate feedback on the statistical uniqueness of segments and struggle with processing large volumes of data in a timely manner.

Innovation Solution

A user interface is provided that identifies and represents differences between segments based on relative significance, using techniques such as random assignment to eliminate overlap and sampling to prioritize the presentation of significant differences, allowing marketers to easily understand and compare segments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If marketers define many different segments based on numerous business objectives, then the ability to target specific end user groups improves, but the difficulty of distinguishing and understanding how segments differ from one another increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to target specific end user groupsVSAvoiddifficulty of distinguishing and understanding segments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automated feedback by computing and displaying statistical uniqueness metrics for each segment, showing marketers how their segments differ from one another in terms of key characteristics. This feedback loop enables marketers to understand segment distinctions without manually analyzing large datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer that automatically calculates and presents segment comparison metrics, acting as a mediator between the complex segment definitions and the marketer's understanding. This intermediary process handles the complexity of comparing multiple segments across numerous attributes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If segments are defined arbitrarily based on intuition and gut feelings, then the speed of segment creation improves, but the ability to determine whether the segment provides a useful division of end users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of segment creationVSAvoidability to determine segment usefulness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides immediate statistical feedback about segment uniqueness and differentiation, allowing marketers to quickly assess whether their intuitively-defined segments are actually useful. The automated computation of segment comparison metrics gives precise measurement of segment value without requiring time-consuming manual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Quantity of substance

If the volume of end user data in Internet context increases to orders of magnitudes larger, then the richness of available metrics and dimensions improves, but the feasibility of manual comparison becomes infeasible or impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume of end user dataVSAvoidfeasibility of manual comparison
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical comparison processes with automated computational methods. The computer system automatically computes statistical metrics, compares segments across numerous dimensions, and presents results without requiring manual intervention, making large-scale data comparison feasible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If existing systems provide little or no feedback regarding the statistical uniqueness of a segment, then the simplicity of the system structure is maintained, but the ability for a marketer to understand how one segment compares to another segment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of system structureVSAvoidability to understand segment comparison
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces targeted feedback mechanisms that provide marketers with statistical uniqueness metrics and segment comparison information. This feedback is delivered through automated computations that analyze segment characteristics and present meaningful comparisons without requiring complex system restructuring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11080732B2Audience comparison
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 ADOBE INC
  • US11080732B2 patent drawing
  • US11080732B2 patent drawing
  • US11080732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed herein for providing a user interface representing differences between segments of end users. The systems and methods receive user input on a user interface identifying a first segment, the first segment being a subset of the end users having a particular characteristic, determine differences between the first segment and a second segment, and represent, on the user interface, the differences between the first segment and the second segment based on relative significances of the differences. The marketer using the user interface is able to quickly and easily identify the metrics, dimensions, and/or relationships to other segments that most distinguish the compared segments from one another.