Segmentation Correctness Prediction for Focused Image Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image segmentation algorithms often produce inaccurate segmentations, requiring time-consuming manual inspection and correction by users, which is tedious and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A prediction model is trained using machine learning to predict the correctness of segmentations, generated by comparing automatic segmentations with user-corrected segmentations, and visualize the results to highlight areas needing correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual inspection and correction of segmentation is performed, then segmentation accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A prediction model serves as an intermediary between the segmentation algorithm and manual correction. The model predicts which regions are likely to be incorrect, guiding users to focus their inspection and correction efforts only on those predicted regions rather than manually inspecting the entire segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of uniformly applying manual inspection to all segmentation regions, the system applies different levels of inspection based on predicted correctness. Regions predicted to be correct require no manual inspection, while regions predicted to be incorrect receive focused attention, optimizing the allocation of manual correction resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If comprehensive manual inspection of segmentation is performed, then correctness is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecorrectnessVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial manual inspection by focusing only on regions predicted to be incorrect rather than inspecting the entire segmentation. This partial action maintains adequate correctness for critical regions while significantly improving overall productivity by avoiding redundant inspection of already-correct areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If the segmentation algorithm is made more complex to improve accuracy, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the segmentation validation task into two components: an automated segmentation algorithm and a prediction model for correctness assessment. This segmentation allows each component to remain relatively simple while the combination provides high overall accuracy through the prediction model's guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3871189B1Predicting correctness of algorithmic segmentation
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP3871189B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3871189B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3871189B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A prediction model is provided which is capable of predicting a correctness of a segmentation by a segmentation algorithm. The prediction model may be trained using a machine learning technique, and after training used to predict the correctness of a segmentation of a boundary in respective image portions of an image by the segmentation algorithm. The predicted correctness may then be visualized, for example as an overlay of the segmentation.